Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8333 P&H
Judgement Date : 26 May, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:077127
2023:PHHC:077127 Page 1 of 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
113 CR-3284-2023 (O&M)
Date of decision: 26.05.2023
Sant Ram
...Petitioner(s)
Vs.
Kundan Singh (since deceased) through LRs & Others
...Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present:- Mr. Jagjit Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner.
***
NIDHI GUPTA, J.
Present Revision Petition has been filed by the judgment
debtor against order dated 12.05.2023 (Annexure P6) passed by learned
Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sultanpur Lodhi, District Kapurthala
whereby objections filed by the petitioner in Execution Petition No.50 of
2019 filed by respondent No.1/decree-holder, have been dismissed.
2. Brief facts of the case are that plaintiff/respondent No.1
herein had filed a Civil Suit for possession of the plot/house as described in
the head note of the plaint. Vide order dated 07.11.2008 (Annexure P1),
the learned trial Court had dismissed the said Suit. Appeal filed by
respondent No.1 was allowed by learned First Appellate Court vide
judgment and decree dated 08.03.2010 (Annexure P2). The petitioner filed
RSA No.3332 of 2010 before this Court which was dismissed vide order
dated 26.02.2019 (Annexure P3). Consequentially, respondent
No.1/plaintiff/decree holder filed present execution petition No.50 of 2019
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:077127
before learned Civil Court (Senior Division), Sultanpur Lodhi, District
Kapurthala, in which the petitioner filed present objection petition on
15.03.2022 (Annexure P5).
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to deny that
present objections (Annexure P5) filed by the petitioner in Execution
Petition are identical to the grounds/objections taken by the petitioner at
the time of appeal; and the same stand duly decided/rejected vide
judgment and decree dated 08.03.2010 which is under execution.
Admittedly, learned Executing Court cannot go beyond the judgment and
decree dated 08.03.2010 and therefore, correctly found that there was no
merit in the objections filed by the petitioner.
4. Accordingly, I find no ground is made out to exercise the
revisional jurisdiction of this Court.
5. Dismissed.
6. Pending application(s) if any also stand(s) disposed of.
26.05.2023 (Nidhi Gupta)
Sunena Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:077127
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!