Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9106 P&H
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2023
121
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRWP-6352-2023(O&M)
Date of Decision: 27.06.2023
Rajesh and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER
Present : Mr. Amandeep Singh Gulati, Advocate
for the petitioners.
HARSH BUNGER, J. (ORAL)
CRM-W-922-2023
This is an application seeking exemption from filing the local
resident proofs of both the petitioners.
Criminal Misc. Application is allowed as prayed for.
CRWP-6352-2023
1. Prayer in the instant petition, filed under Article 226/227 of the
Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to respondents Nos.1 to 3,
to provide protection of life and liberty to the petitioners, who have married
against wishes of private respondent Nos.4 to 10.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1-
Rajesh, aged about 27 years and petitioner No.2-Roshni Devi, aged about 20
years, have got married on 21.06.2023, against wishes of the family
members / relatives / friends of petitioner No. 2 (Roshni Devi), arrayed as
respondent Nos. 4 to 10. It has been further submitted that private
respondents are threatening and trying to interfere in the marital life of the HIMANI GUPTA 2023.06.27 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CRWP-6352-2023(O&M) -2-
petitioners. Hence, they are seeking protection in that regard and have
approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition.
3. Notice of motion to respondent Nos. 1 to 3-State only.
4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Rupinder Singh Jhund,
Additional A.G. Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on
behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3-State.
5. In view of the above, present petition is disposed of with a
direction to respondent No. 2 -Superintendent of Police, District Panchkula,
Haryana, to look into the representation dated 21.06.2023 (Annexure P-4),
qua threat perception, if any, and take necessary steps, if any required, in
accordance with law, to ensure that life and liberty of the petitioners is not
jeopardized at the hands of private respondents. However, this direction
shall not be construed to validate the marriage, said to have taken place
between petitioner Nos. 1 and 2. This order shall also not be taken to protect
the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by
them and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be
initiated in the matter in accordance with law.
June 27, 2023 (HARSH BUNGER)
Himani JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
HIMANI GUPTA
2023.06.27 18:43
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!