Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9102 P&H
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2023
111
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRWP-6337-2023 (O&M)
CRM-W-920-2023
Date of Decision: 27.06.2023
MANMEET KAUR AND ANOTHER ...Petitioners
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER
Present : Mr. Rajesh Bhateja, Advocate
for the petitioners.
HARSH BUNGER, J. (ORAL)
CRM-W-920-2023
Criminal Misc. Application is allowed, as prayed for.
CRWP-6337-2023
1. Prayer in the instant petition, filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to respondents Nos.2 and
3, to provide protection of life and liberty to the petitioners, who have
married against wishes of private respondent Nos. 4 to 7.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1
- Manmeet Kaur, aged about 18 years and petitioner No.2 - Amarjit Singh,
aged above 27 years, have got married on 21.06.2023, against wishes of the
family members / relatives / friends of petitioner No.1 (Manmeet Kaur),
arrayed as respondent Nos. 4 to 7. It has been further submitted that private
respondents are threatening and trying to interfere in the marital life of the
petitioners. Hence, they are seeking protection in that regard and have
approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition.
3. Notice of motion to respondent Nos. 1 to 3-State only.
GURPREET KAUR
2023.06.27 18:39
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order/judgment
CRWP-6337-2023 (O&M) -2-
4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Gurlal Singh Dhillon, Assistant
Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on
behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3-State.
5. In view of the above, present petition is disposed of with a
direction to respondent No. 2 - Senior Superintendent of Police, Pathankot,
to look into the representation dated 21.06.2023 (Annexure P-5), qua threat
perception, if any, and take necessary steps, if any required, in accordance
with law, to ensure that life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at
the hands of private respondents. However, this direction shall not be
construed to validate the marriage, said to have taken place between
petitioner Nos. 1 and 2. This order shall also not be taken to protect the
petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them
and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be
initiated in the matter in accordance with law.
June 27, 2023 (HARSH BUNGER)
gurpreet JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
GURPREET KAUR
2023.06.27 18:39
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this order/judgment
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!