Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9099 P&H
Judgement Date : 27 June, 2023
125
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRWP-6362-2023
Date of Decision: 27.06.2023
Kirti and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSH BUNGER
Present : Ms. Bhavna Grewal, Advocate
for the petitioners.
HARSH BUNGER, J. (ORAL)
1. Prayer in the instant petition, filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to respondents Nos.2 and
3, to provide protection of life and liberty to the petitioners, who have
married against wishes of private respondent Nos.4 to 6.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1-
Kirti, aged about 24 years and petitioner No.2-Raj Kumar Soni, aged about
30 years, have got married on 21.06.2023, against wishes of the family
members / relatives / friends of petitioner No. 1 (Kirti), arrayed as
respondent Nos. 4 to 6. It has been further submitted that private
respondents are threatening and trying to interfere in the marital life of the
petitioners. Hence, they are seeking protection in that regard and have
approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition.
3. Notice of motion to respondent Nos. 1 to 3-State only.
4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Rupinder Singh Jhund,
HIMANI GUPTA 2023.06.27 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh
Additional A.G. Haryana, who is present in the Court, accepts notice on
behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 3-State.
5. In view of the above, present petition is disposed of with a
direction to respondent No. 2 -Superintendent of Police, Rohtak, to look into
the representation dated 23.06.2023 (Annexure P-5), qua threat perception,
if any, and take necessary steps, if any required, in accordance with law, to
ensure that life and liberty of the petitioners is not jeopardized at the hands
of private respondents. However, this direction shall not be construed to
validate the marriage, said to have taken place between petitioner Nos. 1 and
2. This order shall also not be taken to protect the petitioners from legal
action for violation of law, if any, committed by them and will have no
effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter
in accordance with law.
June 27, 2023 (HARSH BUNGER)
Himani JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
HIMANI GUPTA
2023.06.27 18:43
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this document/judgment
High Court, Chandigarh
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!