Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9027 P&H
Judgement Date : 7 June, 2023
SANDEEP SETHI 2023.06.08 06:37 2023:PHHC:081709 CRWP-5699-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (116) CRWP-5699-2023. Date of Decision:-07.06.2023. Anjali Chopra and another beeen Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others beeees Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN 3 2 3 3k Present: Mr. Jatin, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Siddharth Attri, AAG, Punjab. 3k 6 2 ie ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)
1. The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Article
226 of the Constitution of India for directing respondent Nos.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners.
2. It is the case of the petitioners that they both are major inasmuch as petitioner No.1 was born on 23.12.2003 and petitioner No.2 was born on 20.09.1996, and have married each other on 03.06.2023, with their free consent and without any pressure and that this is their first marriage. Reliance has been placed upon Aadhaar Cards (Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively), the Marriage Certificate (Annexure P-3) and photographs (Annexure P-4). It is also stated in the petition that a detailed representation dated 03.06.2023 (Annexure P-5) has also been given to
respondent Nos.2 with regard to the same.
| attest to the accuracy and integrity of this Order/Judgment.
SANDEEP SETHI 2023.06.08 06:37
2023:PHHC:081709 CRWP-5699-2023
3. Notice of motion to respondent Nos.1 to 3 only.
4. On advance notice, Mr. Siddharth Attri, AAG, Punjab, appears and accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 to 3 and on a specific query put by this Court, he has stated that he has no objection in case, respondent No.2-Commissioner of Police, Jalandhar, District Jaldhar, Punjab, looks into the representation dated 03.06.2023 (Annexure P-5) and takes appropriate action in accordance with law.
5. After considering the abovesaid facts and without commenting upon the legality of the marriage and expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the present Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to look into the representation (Annexure P-5) and after considering the threat perception to the petitioners, respondent No.2 will take appropriate action in accordance with law.
6. It is, however, clarified that this order shall not debar the State
from proceeding against the petitioners, if involved in any case.
(ALOK JAIN) JUDGE
June 07, 2023.
Sandeep
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No
| attest to the accuracy and integrity of this Order/Judgment.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!