Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9496 P&H
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:085275
CWP-25562-2022 (O&M) -1- 2023:PHHC:085275
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
275 CWP-25562-2022 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 06.07.2023
Gurmeet Kaur and another .... Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others .... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Present: Mr. Satyendra Chauhan, Advocate, for
Mr. P.S. Khurana, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Vikas Arora, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. H.S. Saini, Advocate
for applicants-respondents No.4 to 6.
*****
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J (ORAL)
CM-10162-CWP-2023
This is an application for impleadment of the applicants as
respondents No.4 to 6 being necessary party.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not have any objection
for their impleadment.
Heard.
In view of the averments mentioned in the application, the
application is allowed subject to all just exceptions and the applicants are
ordered to be impleaded as respondents No.4 to 6.
Amended memo of parties is taken on record.
CM-10163-CWP-2023
This is an application for pre-poning the date of hearing of the
1 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:085275
CWP-25562-2022 (O&M) -2- 2023:PHHC:085275
main petition from 16.08.2023 to some early date.
Heard.
In view of the averments mentioned in the application, the
application is allowed and the date of hearing of the main petition is pre-
poned for today itself.
CM-10164-CWP-2023
This application has been moved by the newly impleaded
respondents No.4 to 6 stating that the issue involved in the present writ
petition stands finally adjudicated by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and
this petition may be accordingly disposed of as the selections have been
stopped because of the pendency of the petitions. He has relied upon a
judgment passed in CWP-4035-2022 titled 'Satnam Singh and others Vs.
State of Punjab and others', decided on 24.05.2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the
applicability of the said judgment to the prior case.
Accordingly, the application is allowed.
Main Case
Having noticed above, this Court finds that the judgment in the
case of Satnam Singh (supra), the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has held
as under:-
"14. From the foregoing discussion, it is evident that the Court, in the matters of policy decision, is not expected to direct the Government to frame a particular policy, in a particular manner. The scope of jurisdiction in policy matters is well known and the Courts have been advised by the Supreme Court to desist from the temptation of interference in the policy matters.
15. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and discussion, finding no merits, all the writs petitions are dismissed.
2 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:085275
CWP-25562-2022 (O&M) -3- 2023:PHHC:085275
16. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of."
Keeping in view the above, the present petition also stands
dismissed mutatis mutandis.
The pending miscellaneous application, if any, shall also stand
disposed of.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA)
06.07.2023 JUDGE
D.Bansal
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:085275
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!