Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Krishna vs State Of Punjab And Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 9482 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9482 P&H
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Krishna vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 6 July, 2023
                                                      Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:084937




CRM-A-2377-MA of 2017           2023:PHHC:084937
                                                                                   [1]


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                       AT CHANDIGARH

                                          CRM-A-2377-MA of 2017
                                          Date of decision: 6th July, 2023
Krishna
                                                                        ...Applicant
                                      Versus

State of Punjab and others
                                                                     ...Respondent


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:    Mr. Sachit Khurana, Advocate for the applicant.

                 ****

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (Oral):

1. This is an application for grant of leave to appeal against the

judgment acquitting the accused in Complaint Case No.

22T/9.5.2012/17.4.2014.

2. The facts shorn off unnecessary details are that the applicant

filed a complaint stating that her husband-Ramesh Kumar Arora (deceased)

committed suicide on 9.3.2010. A suicide note was recovered from the

dickey of the scooter of the deceased bearing registrationNo. PB -11D-

0349. As per the contents of the suicide note, the accused were responsible

for the death of the deceased. The deceased committed suicide by jumping

in front of the train. In the FIR registered, cancellation report filed by the

police was accepted and thereafter the complaint was filed.

3 The trial court summoned the accused, after considering the

facts and appreciating the evidence adduced concluded that the allegation

of abetment to commit suicide was not proved. While acquitting the

1 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:084937

CRM-A-2377-MA of 2017 2023:PHHC:084937 [2]

accused, following aspects were considered:

(i) As per the deposition of the complainant and her son, the

deceased was under tension as the accused, ( i.e. the subordinate staff in

State Bank of Patiala, Nabha Branch where the deceased was Chief

Manager) were not properly discharging their official duties. Further that

inspecting team of Reserve Bank of India recovered counterfeit currency

worth Rs.14,100/- from the cash chest.

(ii) The deceased used to work late till night at home to complete

the work.

(iii) No motive was proved for abetment of suicide.

(iv) The allegation of conspiracy hatched by the accused against the

deceased was not substantiated.

(v) The deceased had not to record Annual Confidential Reports of

the accused as also that non-performance of official duties by the accused

was never reported to the higher authorities.

(vi) The allegation that counterfeit currency was planted by the

accused in cash chest was not taken to the logical end. The deceased had

neither reported to the higher authorities nor got registered an FIR, though

the successor of the deceased got an FIR lodged.

(vii) The suicide note neither gave any detail with regard to

abetment by the accused nor the reason for abetment. It only mentioned that

subordinate staff along with RBI official were conspiring against the

deceased.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the lower court

erred in acquitting the accused and the deposition of the complainant and

2 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:084937

CRM-A-2377-MA of 2017 2023:PHHC:084937 [3]

her son was not appreciated in a proper manner.

5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 6 The ingredients of Section 306 IPC have been dealt in M.

Arjunan v. State, represented by its Inspector of Police, (2019) 3 SCC

315. The same are reproduced below:

"8. The essential ingredients of the offence under Section 306 I.P.C. are: (i) the abetment; (ii) the intention of the accused to aid or instigate or abet the deceased to commit suicide. The act of the accused, however, insulting the deceased by using abusive language will not, by itself, constitute the abetment of suicide. There should be evidence capable of suggesting that the accused intended by such act to instigate the deceased to commit suicide. Unless the ingredients of instigation/abetment to commit suicide are satisfied, accused cannot be convicted under Section 306 I.P.C."

7. The scope for interference in appeal against acquittal is

well settled. A Division Bench of this Court in State of Punjab v.

Hansa Singh, 2001 (1) RCR (Criminal) 775, while dealing with an

appeal against acquittal held:

"We are of the opinion that the matter would have to be examined in the light of the observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ashok Kumar v. State of Rajasthan, 1991(1) SCC 166, which are that interference in an appeal against acquittal would be called for only if the judgment under appeal were perverse or based on a mis-reading of the evidence and merely because the appellate Court was inclined to take a different view, could not be a reason calling for interference."

3 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:084937

CRM-A-2377-MA of 2017 2023:PHHC:084937 [4]

8. The conclusion arrived at by the trial court is plausible one and

does not suffer from perversity. The deposition of the complainant and her

son had not proved abetment of suicide. The trial court rightly concluded

that the deposition only pointed out that the deceased was over burdened

with work; he was not satisfied with the performance of subordinate staff in

discharging the official duties; he had an apprehension that the subordinate

staff along with RBI official conspired against him and planted the

counterfeit currency in cash chest.

9. No case is made out for interference.

10. The application for grant of leave to appeal is dismissed.





                                              [AVNEESH JHINGAN]
                                                   JUDGE
6th July, 2023
mk
            1. Whether speaking/ reasoned            :       Yes / No
            2. Whether reportable                    :       Yes / No




Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:084937

4 of 4

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter