Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jamila vs State Of Haryana And Others
2023 Latest Caselaw 9363 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9363 P&H
Judgement Date : 5 July, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Jamila vs State Of Haryana And Others on 5 July, 2023
                          CRWP No. 6415 of 2023                             1                              2023:PHHC:084454



                          215                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                                         AT CHANDIGARH

                                                                           CRWP No. 6415 of 2023
                                                                           Date of Decision: 05.07.2023

                          Jamila                                                                   ...Pe   oner
                                                                  Versus
                          State of Haryana and others                                              ...Respondents


                          CORAM:            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA

                          Present:          Mr. Amit Siwach, Advocate for
                                            Mr. Sagar Panghal, Advocate the pe      oner.

                                            Mr. Manish Bansal, Sr. D.A.G, Haryana.

                                                                  ****
                          ANOOP CHITKARA, J.

Seeking release of her husband, the pe oner, aged 41 years has come up before this Court by filing the present pe on for habeas corpus.

2. The pe oner's husband was stated to be a truck driver and according to the pe oner, her husband had gone to deliver some goods to Kolkata on 11.04.2022. He had gone with three persons, namely Saalim, Azad and Mubarik i.e. respondents No. 3, 4 and 6. A er that, on 20.04.2022, she received a phone call from her husband that he has threat to his life from the aforesaid persons. Subsequently, on 22.04.2022, the pe oner came to know that the vehicle of the pe oner's husband was traced in the Kaliachak, Police Sta on Malda, District West Bengal. The pe oner's son reached at the police sta on and got to know that the vehicle was found at a deserted place without its driver or owner. Subsequently, he lodged a complaint in Kaliachak police Sta on, West Bengal about everything but no ac on was taken.

3. The concerned Deputy Superintendent of Police has filed the status report and it would be appropriate to extract the contents men oned in paragraphs No. 4 to 8, which reads as follows:

"4. That during the course of enquiry, it came forth that Iqbal (husband of the pe oner) used to drive a Tata LPT 3118 vehicle bearing registra on no. HR-73-7724 (which is in the name of his son Wajib). On 11.04.2022, the said vehicle had gone from Chaupanki (Bhiwadi, Rajasthan) to Kolkata, with Kamdhenu paint. Iqbal was driving the said truck. The said truck reached Kolkata on 16.04.2022 and the goods were unloaded. Iqbal had called his son JYOTI 2023.07.07 14:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

CRWP No. 6415 of 2023 2 2023:PHHC:084454

Wajib on his mobile no. 9813865321 from his (Iqbal's) mobile no. 9991861895. Therea er, Iqbal had stayed in Kolkata ll 20.04.2022 while wai ng for goods to be loaded. Therea er he had filled his truck with iron saria at Durgapur (around 200 kms away from Kolkata) and le for Assam. He had talked to his son Wajib at around 12 AM with regard to Fastag.

5. That on 21.04.2022, when the GPS loca on of the above men oned truck was checked, the loca on was found to be of Dis . Mursidabad (West Bengal). The said truck was found at Kaliyachak, Dis . Malda (West Bengal). However, Iqbal could not be found. The persons namely Wajib, Azad etc. and the person whom Iqbal had called lastly were enquired about Iqbal, however, his loca on could not be found.

6. That therea er, a case FIR No. 565 dated 27.05.2022 u/s 363 IPC was got registered by Wajib (son of missing person Iqbal) at P.S. Kaliyachak, Dis . Malda (West Bengal).

7. That the respondent no. 3 to 6 i.e. Salim, Azad, Ansar and Mubarik were also joined in the enquiry and their statements were recorded. The respondent no. 3 Salim stated that the vehicle used to ply from Bhiwadi to Jharkhand, Patna, Bihar and Kolkata and he was working as conductor and his brother Ansar used to drive the vehicle, from April, Tarif used to drive the vehicle. Now, they have sold the vehicle and Salim remains at home. Iqbal is his uncle (mausa) in rela on. He used to converse with Iqbal from his mobile number 7047534779 He was in remand home at Faridabad in NDPS Act case in the month of March and April. When he came outside the jail, he came to know 2- 3 days later that Iqbal has gone missing. Iqbal was dealing with ganja etc. for the last many years and he was known to the persons in Bihar, Vadodara etc. who used to deal with ganja etc. He does not know anything else about Iqbal.

8. That the respondent no. 4 Azad re-iterated the above men oned averments made by the respondent no. 3 Salim in his statement. The respondent no. 6 stated that he does not know Iqbal and that he has never met him. The statement of respondent no. 3 Salim is annexed as Annexure R- 1 and statement of respondent no. 4 Aazad is annexed as Annexure R-2 and statement of respondent no. 5 Ansar is annexed as Annexure R-3 & statement of respondent no. 6 Mubarik is annexed as Annexure R-4 and statement of Wazid is annexed as Annexure R-5."

4. As per paragraph 4 of the status report, it is men oned that on 16.04.2022, JYOTI the truck had reached Kolkata. As per the pe oner, her husband had spoken with her on 2023.07.07 14:25 20.04.2022. Thus, at that point of me, the pe oner's husband was out side the territorial I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.

CRWP No. 6415 of 2023 3 2023:PHHC:084454

jurisdic on of this Court and was in West Bengal.

5. As per paragraph 6 of the status report, an FIR No. 565 dated 27.05.2022, under Sec on 363 IPC was registered at the instance of Wajib son of Iqbal at Police Sta on Kaliyachak, District Malda (West Bengal).

6. Now a er a gap of 01 year and 02 months, the pe oner has come up before this Court seeking release of her husband from the aforesaid persons. Since the alleged detenue had last talked to the pe oner from West Bengal and a missing report was already registered there, therefore, the present pe on in the nature of habeas corpus is not maintainable in this Court and the present pe on is dismissed with liberty to take all other remedies in accordance with law. All pending miscellaneous applica ons, if any, stand disposed of.




                                                                                    (ANOOP CHITKARA)
                                                                                        JUDGE
                          05.07.2023
                          Jyo -II


                          Whether speaking/reasoned:          Yes
                          Whether reportable:                 No.




JYOTI
2023.07.07 14:25
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this order/judgment.
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter