Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11089 P&H
Judgement Date : 27 July, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:095990
2023:PHHC:095990
-1-
CRM-M-25687-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-25687-2023
Date of decision:27.07.2023
Kamaljit Singh @ Kamaljeet Singh
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab .....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present:- Mr. Amandeep Saini, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
HARNARESH SINGH GILL, J. (ORAL)
Challenge in the present petition is to the order dated
11.09.2018 (Annexure P-6) passed by learned Sub Divisional Judicial
Magistrate, Balachaur, vide which the petitioner has been declared a
proclaimed offender in case bearing FIR No.182 dated 15.12.2017,
registered at Police Station Balachaur, District SBS Nagar, under Sections
406 and 420 IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that when the
above-noted FIR was registered, the petitioner was abroad and he had no
knowledge qua the registration of the present FIR and that proclamation
proceedings initiated against the petitioner are not in accordance with the
provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C. It is further submitted that the matter has
been compromised between the parties and a petition seeking quashing of
FIR is still pending adjudication before this Court. It is further submitted
that the petitioner is ready to surrender before the concerned Court and to
1 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:095990
2023:PHHC:095990
CRM-M-25687-2023
face the trial.
Notice of motion.
On the asking of this Court, Mr. C.L.Pawar, Addl. A. G.
Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State, and submits that
the petitioner had been absconding from the Court of law and thus, he does
not deserve any concession, at this belated stage.
I have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
The objective of the coercive mechanism prescribed under the
Code of Criminal Procedure is to ensure that the accused remains present
before the Court to receive the orders and judgments as are passed qua the
accused. If the accused shows his sincere intention and desire to appear
before the Court, then it would not be unjustified to protect him from being
arrested.
When the above-noted FIR was registered, the petitioner was
not in India. As stated above, the matter has been compromised between
the parties. The petitioner is ready to face the trial. In such circumstances,
this Court finds that no useful purpose would be served by sending the
petitioner to custody.
Keeping in view the above facts, but without expressing any
opinion on the merits of the case, the impugned order dated 11.09.2018
(Annexure P-6), along with all the consequential proceedings arising
therefrom, is hereby set aside, subject to depositing the costs of Rs.20,000/-
by the petitioner with the District Legal Services Authority, SBS, Nagar.
The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial Court/Duty
Magistrate, within 10 days from today and on doing so, he shall be released
2 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:095990
2023:PHHC:095990
CRM-M-25687-2023
on bail, subject to him furnishing fresh bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction
of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
27.07.2023 (HARNARESH SINGH GILL)
parveen kumar JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No
Whether reportable? Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:095990
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!