Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 282 P&H
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
110 CWP-267 of 2023
Date of Decision:09.01.2023
Asha Rani
....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.....Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
Present: Mr. Lalit Goyal, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
****
JASGURPREET SINGH PURI, J. (Oral)
The present writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of
the Constitution of India seeking prayer for release of complete
retiral/pensionary service benefits including gratuity, dearness allowance,
GPF/PF, leave encashment, medical allowance and arrears of increment and
any other consequential benefits etc. alongwith interest.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is a case
where the petitioner had retired on 30.09.2022 from the office of respondent
No. 3 which is the Executive Officer, Nagar Council, Gidderbaha, District Sri
Muktsar Sahib.
Learned counsel the petitioner has submitted that till date the
retiral/pensionary benefits have not been paid to the petitioner without any
jusification and therefore she is entitled for the grant of all the retiral benefits
alongwith interest and even the representation dated 07.10.2022 vide Annexure
P-1 has not yet been decided.
1 of 2
He relied upon Full Bench judgment of this Court in A.S.
Randhawa verus State of Punjab and others 1997(3) SCT 468 to contend
that 2 months time is sufficient time after retirement for payment of retiral
benefits.
Notice of motion.
Ms. Ambika Bedi, learned AAG, Punjab accepts notice on behalf
of respondent No. 1. Ms. Brea Sandhu, proxy counsel for Ms. Deepali Puri,
Addl. A.G. Punjab appeared on behalf of respondents No. 2 and 3.
Since the prayer in the present petition is only for the release of the
retiral/pensionary benefits to the petitioner alongwith the interest @ 18%, this
Court deems it fit and proper to dispose of the present petition with a direction
at this stage to consider and decide the representation dated 07.10.2022 issued
by the petitioner vide Annexure P-1.
Therefore, without observing anything on the merits of the case,
the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 who
is stated to be the competent authority of the petitioner to consider and decide
the representation dated 07.10.2022 (Annexure P-1) in accordance with law by
passing a speaking order within a period of three months from today.
(JASGURPREET SINGH PURI)
JUDGE
January 09, 2023
dinesh
Whether speaking : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!