Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1411 P&H
Judgement Date : 23 January, 2023
CWP-22410-2017 -1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(213) CWP-22410-2017
Date of decision:- 23.01.2023
Rajesh Kumar and another ...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
Present:- Mr. R.S. Mann, Advocate with
Mr. Hardeep Singh, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. R.K.S. Brar, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana.
***
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral)
Instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the
Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for
quashing impugned orders dated 09.02.2017, Annexure P-12 and 13.06.2017,
Annexure P-13 and for issuance of direction to the respondents to consider the
case of the petitioner for promotion from the post of Lab Attendant to the post
of Clerk keeping in view the provision of Haryana Education Department Sub
Offices Ministerial Group-C Service Rules, 1983 as well as judgments passed
by this Court.
Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that one of the reasons
which prevailed with the authorities while rejecting the case of petitioner No.1
for promotion is that the department was in the process of challenging the
judgment passed by this Court on 13.02.2015 in CWP-15797-2011 titled
"Joginder Singh Rathee & others Vs. State of Haryana & others", whereby a
bunch of petitions were allowed. He has invited the attention of this Court to
letter Annexure P-13, addressed to petitioner No.2, wherein the respondents
have stated as under:-
1 of 2
CWP-22410-2017 -2
" Subject:- Demand of promotion on the post of
clerk from back date - Smt. Jai Devi, Lab attendant, G.G.
Senior Sec. School, Faridabad Old.
On the above subject regarding letter no. ME-
2017 / 2228 dated 07.05.2017 of your office.
Returning the matter under subject in original it
is submitted that there is no provision for promotion to the
post of clerk from the post of L.A. under the Class IV
employees' rules. As far as CWP No. 15797/2012 (sic
2011)-Joginder Singh Rathi v. State of Haryana is
concerned, the department has filed LPA in the High
Court. As soon as the decision of Court in the LPA is
received, the necessary action will be taken as per the
rules."
Concededly, LPA-697-2017 titled as "State of Haryana Vs. Krishan
Ram & others" and other connected appeals have been dismissed by this Court
vide order dated 01.08.2017 and SLP(C)s bearing Nos. 019469-019472 of 2018
preferred by the State have also been rejected by the Apex Court.
In view of the above development while setting aside impugned
order, Annexure P-1, writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the
respondent No. 2 to consider the case of the petitioners for promotion in terms
of the judgment passed by this Court in "Joginder Singh Rathee's case
(supra). The exercise be carried out within 4 months from today.
Petition is disposed of.
(SUVIR SEHGAL)
23.01.2023 JUDGE
Harish Kumar
Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!