Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1082 P&H
Judgement Date : 18 January, 2023
CRM-M-2703-2023 - 1-
119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
****
CRM-M-2703-2023 DECIDED ON: 18th JANUARY, 2023
DALJIT SINGH
PETITIONER
VERSUS
STATE OF HARYANA & ANOTHER
RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL.
Present: Mr. Nikhil Vats, Advocate
for the petitioner.
****
SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)
The jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 has been
invoked for quashing of FIR No. 269, dated 16.11.2022 (Annexure P-1),
under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC')
registered at Police Station Sadar Tohana, Fatehabad, with all subsequent
proceedings arising therefrom, in view of compromise.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the
present case, a complaint was filed against the petitioner under Section 138
of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter to be referred as "the
Act of 1881") and in the said complaint, the petitioner was declared as
proclaimed person vide order dated 19.10.2021 (Annexure P-3) and
accordingly, the FIR in question (Annexure P-1) was registered on
16.11.2022 under Section 174-A of the IPC.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that
complaint filed under Section 138 of the Act of 1881 was dismissed as
1 of 3
CRM-M-2703-2023 - 2-
withdrawn vide order dated 10.01.2023 (Annexure P-5).
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the
orders dated 20.07.2022 and 24.08.2022 respectively, passed by a co-
ordinate Bench of this Court in CRM-M-46062-2017, titled as "Jatin
Dhawan and another versus State of Haryana and another" and CRM-
M-12534-2022, titled as "Krishan Kumar versus State of Haryana and
another", wherein it has been held that once the main case is dismissed as
withdrawn the continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A IPC shall
be an abuse of process of law.
He also placed reliance upon the orders of this Court dated
12.12.2022 and 13.12.2022 passed in CRM-M-55634-2022 titled as Jinder
Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another and CRM-M-45051-2022 titled as
Hari Singh Meena Vs. State of Haryana.
Another Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in a case titled as
"Ashok Madan vs. State of Haryana and another" reported as 2020 (4)
RCR (Criminal) 87 has also held as under:-
"No doubt, the learned counsel for the respondent has vehemently argued that the offence under Section 174A I.P.C. is independent of the main case, therefore, merely because the main case has been dismissed for want of prosecution, the present petition cannot be allowed, however, keeping in view the fact that the present FIR was registered only on account of absence from the proceedings in the main case which had been subsequently regularised by the court while granting bail to the petitioner, the default stood condoned. In such circumstances, continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A I.P.C. Shall be abuse of the process of court.
7. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. FIR No.446 dated 21.08.2017, registered under Section 174A I.P.C. At Police Station Kotwali, District Faridabad, as well as consequential 2 of 3
CRM-M-2703-2023 - 3-
proceedings shall stand quashed."
A perusal of the relevant extract of the above judgment would
show that where the main case was dismissed for want of prosecution, it
was observed that the continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A of
the IPC shall be an abuse of the process of court.
In the present case the complaint under Section 138 of the Act
of 1881 has been dismissed as withdrawn. Once the impugned complaint
has been dismissed as withdrawn and the accused stands acquitted, then the
continuance of the prosecution in the FIR under Section 174-A of IPC
would be an abuse of the process of Court.
Keeping in view the above-said facts and circumstances, the
present petition is allowed and FIR No. 269, dated 16.11.2022 (Annexure
P-1), under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC')
registered at Police Station Sadar Tohana, Fatehabad, with all subsequent
proceedings arising therefrom, are hereby quashed qua the petitioner.
(SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 18th JANUARY, 2023.
sham
1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes / No
2. Whether reportable : Yes / No
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!