Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sanjeet Kumar And Others vs State Of Haryana And Another
2023 Latest Caselaw 22198 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 22198 P&H
Judgement Date : 18 December, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Sanjeet Kumar And Others vs State Of Haryana And Another on 18 December, 2023

                                                         Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:162603




                                                            2023:PHHC:162603
CRM-M-24294-2023                                                --1--

     258 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                             CHANDIGARH

                                     CRM-M-24294-2023
                                     DATE OF DECISION:-18.12.2023


Sanjeet Kumar and others                                        ...Petitioners.

                                              vs.

State of Haryana and another                                    ...Respondents..

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

Present: Mr. Ravinder Hooda, Advocate,
         for the petitioners.

         Mr. G.S. Dhillon, AAG, Punjab.

         None for respondent No.2

         ****

HARKESH MANUJA, J.

1. By way of present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the

petitioners pray for quashing of FIR No.385, dated 20.09.2021, under

Sections 323, 34, 452, 506 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959

(Sections 27 and 30 of Arms Act added later on), registered at Police

Station Urban Estate, Rohtak, District Rohtak (Annexure P-1) and all other

subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated

29.04.2023 (Annexure P-2).

2. As per allegations levelled in the FIR, the petitioners while

entering the office of the complainant, gave abuses and beatings to him,

besides it, petitioner No.1 also took out his pistol and threatened to

eliminate him in case money is not returned.

3. In pursuance of order dated 12.05.2023 passed by this Court,

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:162603

2023:PHHC:162603 CRM-M-24294-2023 --2--

whereby parties were directed to appear before the Trial Court for getting

their statements recorded as regards the veracity of compromise arrived at

between them, a report dated 04.07.2023 has been received from the

concerned court, stating that the arrived at between the parties is genuine,

voluntary, without any coercion or undue influence. No accused has been

declared as proclaimed person.

4. Once, the compromise has been arrived at between the parties

without any pressure and respondent No.2 having no objection as regards

quashing of FIR as well as all other subsequent proceedings arising out of

the same against the petitioners; there does not appear to be any impediment

as regards quashing of present FIR qua the petitioners. Even otherwise, in

order to maintain peace and harmony between the parties, particularly under

the circumstances wherein the alleged offences have no societal interest

involved, it would be appropriate to render complete quietus to the

aforementioned dispute by quashing the FIR on the basis of compromise

entered into between the parties.

5. The parties having settled their dispute so as to live in peace in

furture, no useful purpose would be served by proceeding further with the

criminal proceedings. In the light of above developments, no cause remains

for the Trial Court to invest further time and effort in adjudicating this FIR.

The compromise in question is even found to be fully in consonance with

the direction issued by the Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of

Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab

& Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543.

6. Thus, in view of the aforesaid facts, accompanied by statements

of both the parties as well as keeping in mind the law laid down in the

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:162603

2023:PHHC:162603 CRM-M-24294-2023 --3--

aforementioned judgments, FIR No.385, dated 20.09.2021, under Sections

323, 34, 452, 506 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 (Sections 27

and 30 of Arms Act added later on), registered at Police Station Urban

Estate, Rohtak, District Rohtak as well as all subsequent proceedings arising

therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioners.

7. Accordingly, petition stands allowed subject to payment of costs

of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited by the petitioners with the Punjab and

Haryana High Court Association Lawyer's Welfare Fund having Account

No.41564846387 with State Bank of India, High Court Branch, Chandigarh,

within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of

this order.




18.12.2023                                          (HARKESH MANUJA)
sonika                                                  JUDGE
          whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
          whether reportable:        Yes/No




                                                         Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:162603

                                     3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter