Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Virender Singh Nandal vs State Of Haryana And Others
2023 Latest Caselaw 21860 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 21860 P&H
Judgement Date : 14 December, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Virender Singh Nandal vs State Of Haryana And Others on 14 December, 2023

Author: Gurvinder Singh Gill

Bench: Gurvinder Singh Gill

                                                                           2023:PHHC:160553


                                In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana
                                                 At Chandigarh


                                                                  ARB-337-2023 (O&M)
                                                                  Date of Decision:-14.12.2023



                Virender Singh Nandal                                               ... Petitioner

                                                    Versus

                State of Haryana and others                                      ... Respondents



                CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL


                Present:-          Mr. Sandeep K. Sharma, Advocate,
                                   for the petitioner.

                                   Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, DAG, Haryana.

                                                     *****

                GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J. (Oral)

1. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking appointment of an

Arbitrator in terms of provisions of Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation

Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). .

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner had entered into an agreement

(Annexure P-3) with the respondents for construction of Primary Health

Centre and residential quarters at Village Pakashma in District Rohtak. The

said agreement specifically provided that in case of any dispute, the same

would be resolved by Superintendent Engineer, Rohtak Circle, Hr. PWD

(B&R) Br. Rohtak and upon failure of the same being resolved, the matter

ARB-337-2023 (O&M) (2) 2023:PHHC:160553

was to be referred to the Arbitrator. A dispute having arisen, the petitioner

invoked arbitration and issued notice dated 16.6.2023 (Annexure P-5) to the

respondents, but to no avail.

3. Pursuant to issuance of notice of motion, Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, DAG,

Haryana has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent - State. Learned

State counsel has passed on a copy of order dated 8.11.2023 passed by

Superintendent B&R(W) for Additional Chief Secretary to Government of

Haryana, Public Works (B&R) & Architecture Department indicating that

Shri Chaman Lal, Engineer-in-Chief (Retd.) has been appointed as sole

Arbitrator. The same is taken on record.

4. However, this Court finds that the said Arbitrator has been appointed after the

petitioner had already approached this Court by way of filing a petition under

Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of

an Arbitrator. While the petition was instituted on 29.7.2023, the aforesaid

order was passed on 8.11.2023. Hon'ble Apex Court in M/s Durga Welding

Works Versus Chief Engineer, Railway Electrification, Allahabad and another,

(2022)3 SCC 98 while relying upon judgments in M/s Datar Switchgears Ltd.

Versus Tata Finance Ltd. & Anr., 2008(8) SCC 151 and Punj Lloyd Ltd. Vs.

Petronet MHB Ltd., 2006(2) SCC 638, reiterated that once an application

Under Section 11(6) of the Act is instituted in the High Court for appointment

of Arbitrator, the respondent forfeits his right to appoint an arbitrator, and

High Court alone would have jurisdiction to appoint arbitrator.

5. Since the agreement (Annexure P-3) specifically provides for resolution of

disputes by way of arbitration and the petitioner had already served notice

dated 16.6.2023 (Annexure P-5) upon the respondents so as to invoke

ARB-337-2023 (O&M) (3) 2023:PHHC:160553

arbitration clause, the instant petition merits acceptance and is hereby

accepted.

6. Accordingly, Shri B.M. Bedi, District & Sessions Judge (Retd.), Haryana is

appointed as the sole Arbitrator. However, such appointment would be subject

to the declaration to be made by Shri B.M. Bedi, District & Sessions Judge

(Retd.), Haryana under Section 12 of the Act with regard to his independence

and impartiality to settle the disputes between the parties.

7. The Arbitrator shall be paid fee in accordance with the Fourth Schedule of the

Act, as amended or as may be mutually settled by the parties and the

Arbitrator.

8. The Arbitrator shall conduct proceedings at Chandigarh or at any other place

convenient to all concerned.

9. After seeking convenience of the Arbitrator, the parties are directed to appear

before him on 9.1.2024 at 11:00 A.M. or any other date suitable to all

concerned.

10. A copy of this order be sent to the appointed Arbitrator at the given address :

H. No. 22, Sector 4, Panchkula. Phone Nos.0172-4173603, 80543-81862.

11. The petition is accordingly disposed of in the above mentioned terms.





                14.12.2023                                                     ( Gurvinder Singh Gill )
                pankaj                                                                 Judge

                                 Whether speaking /reasoned         Yes / No

                                 Whether Reportable                 Yes / No








 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter