Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dharam Dev And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 21014 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 21014 P&H
Judgement Date : 4 December, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Dharam Dev And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Ors on 4 December, 2023

Author: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

Bench: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

                                                          Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:154711




                                                            {2023:PHHC:154711}

319
       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                      CHANDIGARH

                                             CWP-8805-1997 (O&M)
                                             Date of Decision:04.12.2023

DHARAM DEV AND OTHERS                                              ........Petitioners
                                                  V/s.
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHER                                       ........Respondents

CORAM:        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

Present:      None for the petitioner.

              Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab.

         ***
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J. (Oral)

1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners.

2. This Writ Petition is pending since 1997 wherein the petitioners

have prayed for directing the respondents to pay the petitioners higher grade

in accordance with the qualifications possessed/acquired by them in terms of

the Government instructions issued from time to time and the order passed by

this Court.

3. The petitioners have relied on the directions on the issue by the

State Government for granting benefit of additional increment on acquiring

higher qualifications of Graduation. It is stated that the Teachers had

preferred Writ Petition before this Court and the judgment passed in the

Kirpal Singh Bhatia and Others Vs. Union of India and Others;

1970 CLJ 81, whereby the Teachers were directed to be paid according to the

qualifications irrespective of the posts they were holding.

4. It is further stated that the State Government issued a circular on

19.02.1979 directing to grant the Teachers benefit of the higher qualification,

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:154711

{2023:PHHC:154711} CWP-8805-1997 (O&M)

higher pay scale who had had acquired their qualification before the issuance

of the said letter.

5. Vide another letter dated 20.09.1979, it was clarified that those

who have improved their qualification be also given the higher pay scale.

6. It was, however, further stated that the actual payment of

enhanced rates will commence from 19.02.1979 and the payment of arrears

would be restricted to maximum of 38 months. Thereafter, vide letter dated

07.08.1986, a decision was taken by the State Government to grant higher

pay scale to all those Teachers who possess higher qualifications of Part I and

Part II or BA in addition to the qualifications required for the post they are

holding. It is submitted that the petitioners have been discriminated as JBT

Teachers while they have granted the scale to the Masters and Mistresses

belonging to the State cadre, the petitioners aggrieved of their not granting of

grade of `110-`250/-.

7. Per contra, learned State counsel relied on the judgment passed

in the case of State of Punjab and Others Vs. Om Parkash Kaushal wherein

the Supreme Court has noticed that the benefit of grant of higher pay scale on

acquiring Post Graduate qualifications was only upto 19.02.1979, whereafter,

it was provided that all those who acquired the qualification prior to the

issuance of the order dated 19.02.01979 would be entitled to the same. The

petitioners' claim has been contested and it is stated that the petitioners did

not acquire their qualifications prior to 19.02.10979, and acquired the same

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:154711

{2023:PHHC:154711} CWP-8805-1997 (O&M)

after cut-off date 19.02.1979 and therefore, they would not be entitled to the

said benefit.

8. No counter has been filed by the petitioners to the reply of the

respondents. In view thereof, the statement made by the learned State counsel

is accepted and accordingly, since the petitioners have acquired qualifications

after the cut-off date i.e. 19.02.1979 as stated by the respondents, no relief

possible can be granted to them. The Writ Petition is dismissed accordingly.

9. All the pending applications in this Writ Petition stand disposed

of accordingly.

December 4, 2023                                 [ SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA]
Ess Kay                                                      JUDGE

          Whether speaking / reasoned            :         Yes     /   No

          Whether Reportable                     :         Yes     /   No




                                                            Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:154711

                                        3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter