Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suman Kumari vs State Of Punjab And Others
2023 Latest Caselaw 20924 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 20924 P&H
Judgement Date : 2 December, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Suman Kumari vs State Of Punjab And Others on 2 December, 2023

Author: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

Bench: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

RAJESH KUMAR
2023.12.04 15:23

105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

2023:PHHC: 153462

CWP-27025-2023

Date of Decision: 02.12.2023
Suman Kumari ...Petitioner

Vs.

State of Punjab and others ...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

Present Ms. R.K. Grewal, Advocate for the petitioner.
2K 6k

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)

1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition praying for granting the benefits of pay fixation from the date on which she was appointed as Teaching Fellow i.e. w.e.f. 14.03.2012 instead of the date of regularization i.e. 21.05.2015.

2. Learned counsel submits that once the petitioner's services had been regularized from the date of joining i.e. 14.03.2012, the benefit of pay and allowances should also be extended from the same date. It is also submitted that in similar circumstances earlier the benefits were extended by the State Authorities from the date of regular appointment and in order to buttress the arguments, learned counsel has invited the attention to the document Annexure P/7 issued on 26.09.2012, whereby one Balbir Kaur, was regularized and was granted pay and allowances from the date of her initial appointment i.e. 20.10.2010. Learned counsel submits that there are also similar writ petition pending before this Court.

3, I have considered the submissions.

| attest to the accuracy and authenticity

of thi

is order/iu Haryana Hig

ary:

idgment, Punjab & Court, Chandigarh.

CWP-27025-2023 2023:PHHC: 153462

4. Pendency of other writ petitions would not deter this Court from deciding the petition at the admission stage. The regularization of the petitioner was passed on a policy laid down by the Principal Secretary, Education Department, after holding a meeting with the concerned officials and it would apposite to quote the order passed as under:-

"Hon'ble Principal Secretary, School Education, Punjab, held a meeting of concerned officials on 21.05.2015, keeping in view the Civil Writ Petition No.18275 of 2013, Maghar Singh vs. State of Punjab and many other such civil writ petitions filed by the candidates in the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court for the purpose of regularization of their services on the post of teaching fellows and it has been decided that the teaching fellows appointed after 01.04.2011 who could not be regularized are hereby regularized w.ef. 21.05.2015, without giving any financial benefits from the back date. Before doing so, it be ensured that they fulfill all the conditions contained in the

agreement of recruitment of teaching fellow."

5. Whereafter the petitioner who had not filed any writ petition before this Court was given benefit of orders passed in favour of others. All persons who were granted the benefit of order dated 25.05.2015, were thus bound by the conditions laid down therein i.e. they shall be regularized w.e.f. 21.05.2015, without giving any financial benefit from the back date. The petitioner too was regularized w.e.f. 21.05.2015, although was appointed prior to the same. Thus from the date when the petitioner was regularized, benefits have been extended to him. Claim for benefits prior to the date of regularization, therefore, is not admissible. In the case of Balbir Kaur's (supra) also it is noticed that the regularization was w.e.f. the earlier date on

20.10.2010, and, therefore, pay fixation was done from the said date. The

RAJESH KUMAR

2023.12.04 15:23

| attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment, Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

CWP-27025-2023 2023:PHHC: 153462

principal which emerges is that pay scale shall be admissible only from the

date of regularization.

6. In view thereof, the writ petition fails and the same is dismissed accordingly.

7. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of.

(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE

02.12.2023

rajesh

1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No

2. Whether reportable? : Yes/No

RAJESH KUMAR

2023.12.04 15:23

| attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment, Punjab & Haryana High Court, Chandigarh.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter