Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ganga Deen Through Lrs vs State Of Haryana And Others
2023 Latest Caselaw 14443 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14443 P&H
Judgement Date : 29 August, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Ganga Deen Through Lrs vs State Of Haryana And Others on 29 August, 2023
                                                        Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:115083




                                            -1-
RFA No. 1259 of 2022 (O&M) and                            2023:PHHC:115083
RFA No. 1261 of 2022 (O&M)



288 (2 cases)

      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                    AT CHANDIGARH

(1)                                          RFA No. 1259 of 2022 (O&M)
                                             Date of Decision: 29.08.2023

Ganga Deen (since deceased) through LRs
                                                                  ...Appellants
                                    Versus

State of Haryana and others

                                                              ...Respondents

(2)                                          RFA No. 1261 of 2022 (O&M)


Ramesh Chand through LRs
                                                                  ...Appellants
                                    Versus
State of Haryana and others

                                                              ...Respondents

CORAM:          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

Present:        Mr. Deepinder Singh Walia, Advocate
                for the appellant(s) (in both cases).

                Mr. Shivendra Swaroop, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana

                Mr. Pritam Singh, Saini, Advocate
                for respondent-HSIIDC.

                                             ****
HARKESH MANUJA, J.

CM-3293-CI-2022 in RFA-1259-2022 CM-3322-CI-2022 in RFA-1261-2022

Applications are allowed, as prayed for, subject to all just

exceptions. The delay of three (03) days in filing the respective appeals

is condoned.

1 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:115083

RFA No. 1259 of 2022 (O&M) and 2023:PHHC:115083 RFA No. 1261 of 2022 (O&M)

MAIN APPEAL(S)

This order shall dispose off present two appeals bearing

RFA Nos. 1259 & 1261 of 2022, as the same arise out of common

acquisition / award.

[2] The appellants / landowners, by instituting the present

appeals preferred under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894

(for short "the Act"), are seeking modification of the award dated

14.10.2021 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Rewari

(hereinafter to be referred as "Reference Court") for enhancement of

compensation amount.

[3] In pursuance of Haryana Govt. Notification under Section 4

of the Act issued on 08.06.2007, followed by Notification dated

27.02.2008 under Section 6 thereof, the land measuring 584 acres,

including the land of appellant(s), situated in the revenue estate of

Villages Bawal, Chirhara, Banipur and Rudh, District Rewari, was

acquired. The public purpose for acquisition of land was stated to be

development of Industrial Model Township, Phase-III, Bawal. The Land

Acquisition Collector, Rewari (for short "LAC"), vide Awards dated

25.09.2008 & 29.09.2008, assessed the market value of acquired land

@ Rs. 16 lakhs per acre in all the four villages.

[4] In first round, Reference Court by passing different awards

dated 17.01.2015, 30.05.2015, 16.07.2015 & 28.07.2015, assessed the

market value of the acquired land @ Rs. 22 lakhs per acre; however,

these awards were set aside by this Court vide order dated 15.11.2017

passed in case titled "Haryana State Industrial Development

Corporation (now HSIIDC) Versus Ram Kanwar (deceased) through

2 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:115083

RFA No. 1259 of 2022 (O&M) and 2023:PHHC:115083 RFA No. 1261 of 2022 (O&M)

LRs and others" while remitted back the matter to Reference Court for

deciding the matter afresh.

[5] In second round, Reference Court vide Award dated

14.10.2021 assessed the market value of the acquired land @ Rs.

32,26,914/- per acre. Aggrieved thereof, the appellants have preferred

the present appeals.

[6] It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant(s) that

present appeal is squarely covered with the judgment dated 13.09.2022

passed in RFA No. 26 of 2022, titled "HSIIDC Versus Mohakam Ram

and others", arising out of the same notification for the land situated in

the revenue estate of Village Bawal, Tehsil Bawal, District Rewari.

[7] Learned State Counsel is not in a position to controvert the

afore-stated factual aspect that the main appeals are covered in terms of

judgment dated 13.09.2022 passed in Mohakam Ram's case (supra),

however, opposes payment of interest for the period, the appellants

failed to approach this Court after the decision of Reference Court.

[8] I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone

through the paper-book.

[9] From the records, it is apparent that the present appeals

are squarely covered with the judgment dated 13.09.2022 passed in

Mohakam Ram's case (supra), which are arising out of the same

acquisition / Notification dated 08.06.2007 covering the same revenue

estate(s), whereby the landowners have been held entitled for the

compensation @ Rs. 37,60,825/- for the land located upto the depth of

two acres on the Delhi-Jaipur Highway as well as the land located on

both the sides of Bawal-Rewari road. For reference, the relevant para of

3 of 4

Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:115083

RFA No. 1259 of 2022 (O&M) and 2023:PHHC:115083 RFA No. 1261 of 2022 (O&M)

decision dated 13.09.2022 passed in Mohakam Ram's case (supra)

reads as under:-

" 6. DECISION 6.1 In view of the aforesaid detailed discussion, it is held that out of the acquired land, for the land located upto the depth of two acres on the Delhi- Jaipur Highway as well as the land located on both the sides of Bawal-Rewari road, the landowners shall be entitled to compensation @ Rs.37,60,825/-, whereas, for the remaining land, the applications filed by the concerned landowners, under Section 18 of the 1894 Act, shall stand dismissed. Consequently, the appeals filed by HSIIDC shall stand allowed with respect to the acquired land located in the interior i.e. remaining acquired land apart from the land located upto depth of two acres abutting the Delhi- Jaipur Highway and the land located on both the sides of Bawal-Rewari Road."

[9.1] Based upon the above, applying the principle of parity,

besides award of just and fair compensation, the landowners / appellants

being similarly situated are held entitled for grant of similar amount of

compensation as has been awarded to other landowners vide decision

dated 13.09.2022 passed in Mohakam Ram's case (supra) alongwith

all other statutory benefits and interest thereupon as provided under the

Act, except payment of interest for the period the appellants did not

approach this Court after passing of Reference Court's Award.

[10] Disposed off in the above terms.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed off.

August 29, 2023                                          ( HARKESH MANUJA )
'dk kamra'                                                     JUDGE
        Whether Speaking / Reasoned :              Yes      No
        Whether Reportable :                       Yes      No



                                                            Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:115083

                                    4 of 4

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter