Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Magma Hdi General Insurance Co Ltd vs Parul And Others
2023 Latest Caselaw 14420 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 14420 P&H
Judgement Date : 29 August, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Magma Hdi General Insurance Co Ltd vs Parul And Others on 29 August, 2023
                                                                              2023:PHHC:114194

                                           FAO-2473-2023 (O&M)                               -1-


           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

                                                                                     Sr. No.132

                                                          Case No. : FAO-2473-2023 (O&M)
                                                          Date of Decision : August 29, 2023

                               Magma HDI General Insurance Co. Ltd. .... Appellant
                                              vs.
                               Parul and others                        ....    Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURBIR SINGH.

                                           *      *   *

           Present :           Mr. Sanjeev Goyal, Advocate
                               for the applicant-appellant.

                                           *      *   *
           GURBIR SINGH, J. :

1. CM-8829-C-II-2023 : This is application under Section 5 of

the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 14 days in filing the present

appeal. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed

and delay of 14 days in filing the present appeal is condoned. The

application stands disposed of.

2. Main Appeal : This appeal has been filed by Magma HDI

General Insurance Co. Ltd. (for short - Insurance Company) against the

Award dated 17.01.2023, passed by learned Motor Accident Claims

Tribunal, Panipat (for brevity - the Tribunal), in MACP case No.513 of

2019, whereby a sum of Rs.57,56,112/- has been awarded in favour of the

claimants (respondents no.1 to 4 herein) along with interest @ 6% per

annum from the date of filing the petition till actual realization, on account

of death of Narender Sharma, in the motor vehicular accident, which took MONIKA 2023.09.12 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2023:PHHC:114194

FAO-2473-2023 (O&M) -2-

place on 21.02.2019.

3. The learned Tribunal came to the conclusion that Narender

Sharma had died in the accident caused by Inderpal (respondent no.5) while

driving Truck bearing registration No.UP-85-AT-5079 in a rash and

negligent manner. The claimants are the dependents of the deceased, who

was about 33 years of age at the time of his death. His income was assessed

at Rs.3,38,458/- per annum, on the basis of Income Tax Returns (Ex.P-11).

Since there were four claimants, ¼th amount was deducted as personal

expenses. Keeping in view the age, multiplier of 16 was adopted and 40%

income of the deceased was added by way of future prospects and

Rs.70,000/- was awarded for loss of consortium, funeral expenses and loss

of estate.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the learned

Tribunal failed to take note of the fact that net income of the deceased was

Rs.2,98,360/- as there is deduction of Rs.40,100/-, shown in the Income Tax

Return, from the income of the deceased. No Income Tax Returns of M/s

Marble and Stone Company were produced by the claimants. The said

business is being run by the claimants after death of Narender Sharma and is

not closed. At the most, the claimants have suffered loss of managerial

services, which were being provided by the deceased. Therefore, it is

contended that the income of the deceased has been assessed by the Tribunal

on a higher side.

5. I have heard the submissions of learned counsel for the

appellant and also perused the case file.

MONIKA 2023.09.12 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2023:PHHC:114194

FAO-2473-2023 (O&M) -3-

6. As per the Income Tax Returns for the Assessment Year 2019-

20, income of the deceased is Rs.3,38,458/- for said year. The net taxable

income is shown to be Rs.2,98,360/-, after deducting Rs.40,100/-, which is

on account of rebate under Section 80-C of the Income Tax Act. When a

person deposits some part of his income in Life Insurance or contributes

towards Provident Fund etc., then said person is given rebate under Section

80-C of the Income Tax Act on the said income and said amount cannot be

deducted from the income of the deceased for assessing his income. Net

income is the amount, which an individual gets after tax and deductions. In

other words, it is not earning. But taxable income is the amount of one's

income which is subject to income tax. Thus, the deductions permissible

under law are part of income of an individual but same is not taxable. There

is a difference between net income and taxable income. Since a sum of

Rs.40,100/- is income of the deceased and is shown to be deducted from

taxable income for the purpose of levying tax, the argument of learned

counsel for the appellant that the said amount is required to be deducted

from income of the deceased, is without any basis. The income of the

deceased shown in the Income Tax Return is from his business, which is

proprietorship concern of the deceased and it cannot be said that the

claimants have suffered loss only on account of managerial services and not

more than that. A manager cannot yield result what a Proprietor can do. In

case of corporate bodies, position is different. The learned Tribunal has also

relied on two judgments of Hon'ble Apex Court in Malarvizhi and others

vs. United India Insurance Company Limited and others - (2020) 4 SCC MONIKA 2023.09.12 09:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 2023:PHHC:114194

FAO-2473-2023 (O&M) -4-

228 and Smt. Anjali and others vs. Lokendra Rathod and others - Civil

Appeal No.009014 of 2022, decided on 06.12.2022, for placing reliance on

the Income Tax Return of the deceased, for the purpose of assessing the

income of deceased. The Income Tax Return is such a document which is

submitted as per the Statute and Tribunal is required to place reliance on

such a document, in the absence of any other evidence, for assessing the

amount of compensation. The learned Tribunal has rightly assessed the

income of the deceased.

7. In view of the above discussion, I do not find any illegality or

perversity in the impugned Award dated 17.01.2023, passed by the learned

Tribunal. The present appeal, therefore, is without any merit and the same is

accordingly dismissed in limine. The amount of Rs.25,000/-, deposited by

the appellant for filing the appeal, is ordered to be sent to the concerned

Tribunal.

8. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of along with

this judgment.

           August 29, 2023                                       (GURBIR SINGH)
           monika                                                    JUDGE

                               Whether speaking/reasoned ?       Yes/No.
                               Whether reportable ?              Yes/No.




MONIKA
2023.09.12 09:28
I attest to the accuracy and
integrity of this document
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter