Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11725 P&H
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2023
219 IOIN-FAO-3432-2010 in FAO-3432-2010 BEANT KAUR AND ORS. VS JEET SINGH AND ORS. Present: None for the appellants. Ms. Manvi Verma, Advocate for Mr. Rajneesh Malhotra, Advocate for respondent No.4-Insurance Company.
2 2
As per the office report, respondent No.1 has refused to accept notice whereas respondent No.2 has been served. Notice sent to respondent No.3 has been received back with a report that he is not residing at the given address.
On perusal of memo of parties, it is evident that respondent Nos.2 and 3 were the joint owners of the truck. Notice has already been served on respondent No.2, hence, service of respondent No.3 is dispensed with.
IOIN stands disposed of.
(ANIL KSHETARPAL) 02.08.2023 JUDGE Sangeeta
SANGEETA
2023.08.04 16:53
I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!