Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mumtaj And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Others
2023 Latest Caselaw 5774 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5774 P&H
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Mumtaj And Anr vs State Of Haryana And Others on 29 April, 2023
                                                                       2023:PHHC:061206

                               In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana
                                                At Chandigarh


                                                                   CRWP-4100-2023 (O&M)
                                                                   Date of Decision:-29.04.2023



                 Mumtaj and another                                          ... Petitioners

                                                    Versus

                 State of Haryana and others                                 ... Respondents




                 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL

                 Present:-        Mr. D.S.Matya, Advocate with
                                  Mr. Navneet Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.

                                                    *****

GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.(Oral)

1. Petitioner No.1-Mumtaj aged about 19 years and petitioner No.2-Mustaquim

aged about 31 years who is stated to be already married to respondent No.10-

Rashida seek issuance of a direction to the official respondents to protect

their lives and liberty as they apprehend threat to the same at the hands of

private respondents, having married against the wishes of their families.

2. Notice of motion.

3. At this stage Ms. Geeta Sharma, DAG, Haryana, has put in appearance on

behalf of respondent-State and accepts notice.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that although petitioner No.2 is

already married to respondent No.10 and has three children from the said

marriage, but he undertakes to look after the said children and that even

MOHAN SINGH 2023.04.29 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRWP-4100-2023 (O&M) (2) 2023:PHHC:061206

petitioner No.1 does not have any objection for the same as has been

specifically deposed in affidavit (Annexure P-9). The learned counsel for

the petitoner submitted that the petitioner No.2 is willing to deposit an

amount of Rs.10 lakhs in the Court in order to prove his bonafides as regards

his willingness to maintain his children from the first marriage.

5. Keeping in view the aforesaid offer, petitioner No.2 shall deposit the

aforesaid amount of Rs.10 lakhs before learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

Nuh within 15 days from today. Upon deposit of such amount, the Chief

Judicial Magistrate, concerned shall get the same invested in some FDR with

some Nationalized Bank with a specific direction to Manager of the bank

concerned not to entertain any request for encashment of the same except

under orders of the Court.

6. The aforesaid amount may later be ordered to be released by the Court for

the purpose of benefit of the children.

7. Without commenting as regards the veracity of the averments made in the

petition and also as regards the validity of alleged marriage of the petitioners,

the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2-

Superintendent of Police, Nuh, District Nuh, to look into the matter and

consider the alleged threat perception of the petitioners provided the

petitioners submit a detailed representation to respondent No.2 in this regard

within a period of one week from today. In case, it is found that there is a

genuine threat to the lives and liberty of the petitioners, then necessary steps

warranted under law be taken thereupon at the earliest so as to ensure that no

harm is caused to the petitioners.

MOHAN SINGH 2023.04.29 15:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRWP-4100-2023 (O&M) (3) 2023:PHHC:061206

8. A copy of this order be sent to respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police,

Nuh, District Nuh, so as to enable him to do the needful expeditiously.

9. It is, however, clarified that the aforesaid order shall not be taken to be any

expression as regards the validity of marriage of the petitioners and shall not

confer any immunity upon the petitioners, in case it is found that they have

committed any wrong.

                 29.04.2023                                 ( GURVINDER SINGH GILL )
                 mohan                                              JUDGE


                               Whether speaking /reasoned         Yes / No

                               Whether Reportable                 Yes / No




MOHAN SINGH
2023.04.29 15:02
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
order/judgment
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter