Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5707 P&H
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:060942
2023:PHHC:060942
CRM-M-30875 of 2022 #1#
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-30875 of 2022
Date of Decision: 28.04.2023
Kulwinder Singh @ Pindar ....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ....Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARINDER SINGH SIDHU
Present:
Mr. H.S. Bhogal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Dhruv Dayal, Addl.AG, Punjab.
*****
HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J.
Petitioner has filed second petition for grant of regular bail in case
FIR No.55 dated 14.04.2021 under Section 22 of NDPS Act registered at P.S
Sadar Khanna, District Ludhiana.
As per allegations, 25 bottles/vials of WINCIREX 100 ML each,
200 intoxicant tablets mark Celcidal-100 SR, 100 intoxicant capsules mark
MEFAR-PD, 240 intoxicant tablets mark NITRAVET-10 and 1200 intoxicant
tablets mark ALPRASAFE-0.5 were recovered from the possession of the
petitioner and his co-accused.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the alleged
recovery has been planted on the petitioner. The petitioner is not involved in any
other criminal case except the present one and that he has been behind bars for
the last two years and ten days. He contends that the trial is at a preliminary
stage and there is no likelihood of completion of trial in the near future and in
view of delayed trial and keeping in the mind the right to a speedy trial, the
petitioner can be granted bail.
In support, he relies upon the decisions of the Hon'ble Supreme
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:060942
2023:PHHC:060942 CRM-M-30875 of 2022 #2#
Court in SLP(Crl.) No.4173/2022 titled Shariful Islam @ Sarif vs. The State
of West Bengal decided on 22.03.2022, SLP(Crl.) No.5769/2022 titled Nitish
Adhikary @ Bapan vs. The State of West Bengal decided on 04.05.2022,
Criminal Appeal No.1169 of 2022 titled Gopal Krishna Patra @
Gopalrusma vs. Union of India decided on 05.08.2022 and Special Leave to
Appeal (Crl.) No.3961/2022 titled Abdul Majeed Lone vs. Union Territory of
Jammu and Kashmir decided on 01.08.2022, where bail has been granted
taking into account the custody of the petitioners and the stage of the trial.
Learned State counsel does not dispute the custody period. It is
stated that out of twelve prosecution witnesses, only one has been examined so
far.
Without commenting upon the merits of the case and taking into
consideration all the factors and parameters, as propounded in the aforesaid
judgments apart from bearing in mind the custody period as also the fact that the
trial is not likely to be concluded in near future the present petition is allowed.
The petitioner Kulwinder Singh @ Pindar is directed to be released on bail
subject to his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial
Court/Duty Magistrate concerned.
It is made clear that if the petitioner involves himself in similar type
of activity, while on bail, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of
his bail.
April 28, 2023 (HARINDER SINGH SIDHU)
manoj JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether Reportable: Yes/No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:060942
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!