Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5690 P&H
Judgement Date : 28 April, 2023
2023:PHHC:060464
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
108
CRWP-4098-2023
Decided on : 28.04.2023
Paramveer and another
. . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Haryana and others
. . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
PRESENT: Mr. Ajit Singh, Advocate for
Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Advocate
for the petitioner(s).
****
SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)
Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to official respondents, to
provide protection of lives and liberty of the petitioners, who have married
against the wishes of private respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1
- Paramveer, aged about 31 years and petitioner No.2 - Anita, aged above
19 years have solemnized marriage on 25.04.2023, against the wishes of their
family members, arrayed as respondents No.4 to 8. Learned counsel for the
petitioners further submits that it is the first marriage of both the petitioners.
It has been submitted that the private respondents are threatening to interfere
in the matrimonial life of the petitioners. Hence, the petitioners are seeking
protection in that regard and have approached this Court by way of filing the
instant petition. They have also submitted a representation dated 25.04.2023
(Annexure P-5), to respondent No.2 - Superintendent of Police, Fatehabad ,
wherein, they have expressed their apprehension.
3. Notice of motion.
KAVITA NAIN 2023.04.28 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment 2023:PHHC:060464
4. On asking of the Court, Mr. Vikas Bhardwaj, AAG, Haryana,
accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 (State).
5. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a
direction to respondent No.2 - Superintendent of Police, Fatehabad, to look
into the representation dated 25.04.2023 (Annexure P-5), qua threat
perception, and if there is any substance in it, take necessary steps, in
accordance with law, to ensure that the lives and liberty of the petitioners are
not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents.
6. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to
have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or
criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with
law.
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE April 28, 2023 k.nain
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
KAVITA NAIN 2023.04.28 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!