Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Simran Kaur And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Others
2023 Latest Caselaw 5299 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5299 P&H
Judgement Date : 25 April, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Simran Kaur And Anr vs State Of Punjab And Others on 25 April, 2023
                                                                                 2023:PHHC:057905

                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                            AT CHANDIGARH
                      109
                                                                          CRWP-3903-2023
                                                                          Decided on : 25.04.2023

                      Simran Kaur and another
                                                                                   . . . Petitioner(s)
                                                           Versus
                      State of Punjab and others
                                                                                . . . Respondent(s)

                      CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH

                      PRESENT: Mr. Gurjant Singh Swaich, Advocate
                               for the petitioner(s).
                                                           ****

                      SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)

1. Petitioner No.1-Simran Kaur, aged 24 years and petitioner No.2

-Paramjot Singh, aged about 28 years have filed the instant petition for

seeking directions to respondents No.1 & 2 to protect their lives and liberty

which is stated to be at risk at the hands of respondents No.4 to 8, who are

family members of petitioner No.1.

2. Counsel for the petitioners further submits that petitioner No.2

was earlier married to one Gurdev Kaur, d/o Sh. Gursewak Singh r/o Village

Bhaini Sahib, Tehsil and District Ludhiana. However, by way of mutual

divorce decree dated 08.02.2023 passed by the Court of Principal Judge,

Family Court Ludhiana, Camp Court at Samrala, said marriage was dissolved

under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act. Photocopy of the judgment

dated 08.02.2023 is placed on record by the petitioners today in Court, which

is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Office to tag the same at

appropriate place.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the

petitioners have solemnized marriage on 19.04.2023, against the wishes of KAVITA NAIN 2023.04.25 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment 2023:PHHC:057905

their family members, arrayed as respondents No.4 to 8. It has been

submitted that the private respondents are threatening to interfere in the

matrimonial life of the petitioners. Hence, the petitioners are seeking

protection in that regard and have approached this Court by way of filing the

instant petition. They have also submitted a representation dated 19.04.2023

(Annexure P-5), to respondent No.2 - Senior Superintendent of Police,

Khanna, wherein, they have expressed their apprehension.

4. Notice of motion.

5. On asking of the Court, Mr. Anmol Singh Sandhu, AAG,

Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 (State).

6. At this stage, Mr. Harvinder Pal Singh Ghuman, Advocate, puts

in appearance on behalf of respondents No.4 & 6 and files his Vakalatnama

in Court today, which is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions. Office

is directed to tag the same at appropriate place.

He submits that though respondents No.4 & 6 are not averse to

the matrimonial relations of the petitioners, however, if the parents are

afforded a chance, they wish to meet both of them & then to perform the

marriage of the petitioners as per customs.

7. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a

direction to respondent No.2 - Senior Superintendent of Police, Khanna, to

look into the representation dated 19.04.2023 (Annexure P-5), qua threat

perception, and if there is any substance in it, take necessary steps, in

accordance with law, to ensure that the lives and liberty of the petitioners are

not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents.

As far as wish of the private respondents as stated and recorded

hereinabove is concerned, if same is made before the respondent No.2- KAVITA NAIN 2023.04.25 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment 2023:PHHC:057905

Senior Superintendent of Police, Khanna, he/she would examine the situation

and if as per his own wisdom, request made by the private respondents is

found to be genuine, he/she may allow the request of meeting of the parties

under protection cover.

8. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to

have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or

criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with

law.

(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE April 25, 2023 k.nain

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No

KAVITA NAIN 2023.04.25 17:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter