Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4093 P&H
Judgement Date : 13 April, 2023
2023:PHHC:050897
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
123
CRWP-3514-2023
Decided on : 13.04.2023
Mandeep Kaur and another
. . . Petitioner(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
. . . Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH
PRESENT: Ms. Khushika Setia, Advocate
for the petitioners.
****
SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral)
Prayer in the instant petition filed under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, is for issuance of directions to official respondents
No.2 & 3, to provide protection of lives and liberty of the petitioners, who
have married against the wishes of private respondents.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner No.1
- Mandeep Kaur, aged 23 years and petitioner No.2 - Surinder Singh, aged
30 years, have solemnized marriage on 16.03.2023, against the wishes of
their family members, arrayed as respondents No.4 to 6. Learned counsel for
the petitioners further submits that it is the first marriage of both the
petitioners. It has been submitted that the private respondents are threatening
to interfere in the matrimonial life of the petitioners. Hence, the petitioners
are seeking protection in that regard and have approached this Court by way
of filing the instant petition. They have also submitted a representation dated
07.04.2023 (Annexure P-4), to respondent No.2 - Senior Superintendent of
Police, Patiala, wherein, they have expressed their apprehension. KAVITA NAIN 2023.04.13 15:10 3. Notice of motion.
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment 2023:PHHC:050897
4. On asking of the Court, Mr. JS Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts
notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3 (State).
5. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a
direction to respondent No.2 - Senior Superintendent of Police, Patiala, to
look into the representation dated 07.04.2023 (Annexure P-4), qua threat
perception, and if there is any substance in it, take necessary steps, in
accordance with law, to ensure that the lives and liberty of the petitioners are
not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents.
6. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to
have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or
criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with
law.
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE April 13, 2023 k.nain
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
KAVITA NAIN 2023.04.13 15:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document order/judgment
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!