Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Margret James vs Union Of India
2023 Latest Caselaw 3891 P&H

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3891 P&H
Judgement Date : 12 April, 2023

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Margret James vs Union Of India on 12 April, 2023
RAJ KUMAR
2023.04.13 17:52

2023:PHHC:050939

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
273
CR No.1798 of 2023
DATE OF DECISION : 12" APRIL, 2023

Margret James
.... Petitioner
Versus

Union of India through its General Manager, Northern Railways, Baroda
House, New Delhi
.... Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT

3 Ok Ok OK

Present: | Mr. Parminder Singh, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. N. K. Vashist, Sr. Panel Counsel for respondent-UOI.
3K OK OK

RAJBIR SEHRAWAT, J. (Oral)

The petitioner has filed this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying for setting aside the order dated 28.02.2023 (Annexures P-10) whereby application moved for issuance of direction to release the compensation amount lying in the FDR, in order to meet the expenses of under treatment of fracture and for surgery, in the light of order dated 14.02.2023 (Annexure P-8) and report submitted by the Officer of the Railway Department dated 24.02.2023 (Annexure P-9), was dismissed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Chandigarh (in short, the Tribunal); along with certain other prayers.

The counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Tribunal has wrongly declined the prayer of the petitioner for release of the amount of compensation despite there being emergent situation for the petitioner. The counsel has submitted that the petitioner had suffered

fracture in hip bone and requires immediate medical procedures.

| attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgment

RAJ KUMAR 2023.04.13 17:52

CR No.1798 of 2023

Therefore, the petitioner requires money for the said purpose. When the petitioner approached the Tribunal, the Tribunal had also deputed an Inquiry Officer to find out the truth about the factum of the medical condition of the petitioner. Even the said Inquiry Officer had submitted report regarding genuineness of the prayer made by the petitioner recording therein that she had, in fact, suffered the fracture and the hospital had advised the medical procedure. The said report has also been attached with the present petition as Annexure P-9. Hence, the amount of compensation deserves to be released to the petitioner.

On the other hand, the counsel for the respondent-UOI has submitted that the Fixed Deposit was created only pursuant to the direction of the Tribunal. FDR is maturing in December, 2023. In any case the petitioner would be getting the amount in December, 2023. Therefore, there is no requirement of releasing the amount at this stage. However, the counsel has not been able to rebut the factum of the petitioner suffering with the medical condition and the medical procedure having been prescribed for her qua the said problem, as is reflected in the report of the Tribunal appointed Inquiry Officer as well.

Since the petitioner has been awarded the compensation to meet the exigencies of life and, therefore, the petitioner is not unjustified in making prayer to the Tribunal for release of the amount keeping in view the medical condition she is facing. There could have been some doubt had the Tribunal not appointed the Inquiry Officer to assess the medical condition and to verify the prescribed treatment. However, in this case even the Tribunal appointed the Inquiry Officer has

verified the factum of problem being suffered by the petitioner and

| attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgment

CR No.1798 of 2023

requirement of the money. Therefore, the Tribunal should have ordered the release of the amount in favour of the petitioner. Needless to say that compensation amount has been awarded to the petitioner to overcome the difficulties of life. The petitioner cannot be forced to remain in problem despite her money lying in FDR.

Accordingly, the present petition is allowed. The Tribunal is

directed to release the amount of compensation qua the share of the

petitioner forthwith.

12™ APRIL, 2023 (RAJBIR SEHRAWAT)

'raj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes No

Whether Reportable: Yes No

RAJ KUMAR

2023.04.13 17:52

| attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgment

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter