Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3615 P&H
Judgement Date : 11 April, 2023
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:049898
2023:PHHC:049898
1
112-6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CM-4744-CWP-2023 in/and
CWP-2788-2021 (O&M)
Date of decision : 11.04.2023
Hindustan Everest Tools Ltd. ...Petitioner
Vs.
Samey Ram and others ...Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ BAJAJ
Present: Mr. Ramesh Goyat, Advocate
for applicant-respondent No.1.
Mr. Sukhdeep Parmar, DAG, Haryana.
***
MANOJ BAJAJ, J.
CM-4744-CWP-2023
The applicant-respondent No.1 has moved this application under
Section 151 CPC for disposal of the main writ petition, in the light of the
judgment dated 19.12.2022 (Annexure A-1) passed in LPA-424-2020, "M/s
Hindustan Everest Tools Ltd. Vs. Inderjeet and others".
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that vide order dated
04.08.2022, this writ petition was adjourned sine die to await the decision of
LPA No.424-2020 and the same has been decided. He prays that in view of the
judgment dated 19.12.2022, the present writ petition be also decided.
Notice in the application.
At this stage, Mr. Ashwani Talwar, Advocate appears and accepts
notice on behalf of petitioner and does not dispute the above stand of the
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:049898
2023:PHHC:049898
learned counsel for the applicant.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, same is allowed and
on oral request of learned counsel for the parties, the date of hearing of the
main petition is pre-poned to today.
Main case
Petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226
Constitution of India to challenge the order dated 18.11.2020 (Annexure P-37)
passed by appellate authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972,
whereby it has upheld the decision dated 04.01.2019 (Annexure P-35) passed
by the controlling authority, Payment of Gratuity Act, Circle-I, Sonepat,
directing Payment of Gratuity to workman-respondent No.1.
During the course of hearing, it is not disputed by learned counsel
for the parties that the issues raised in this writ petition are identical to the
subject matter contained in the LPA No.424-2020, and arise from the same
cause of action, which has been decided against the writ petitioner. Mr. Talwar,
learned counsel for the petitioner states that the correctness and validity of the
similar impugned decision stands upheld by the Division Bench in decision
dated 19.12.2022, and it squarely covers the issues raised in this writ petition
on merits.
In view of the above common stand of the learned counsel for the
parties, the writ petition is dismissed.
(MANOJ BAJAJ)
JUDGE
11.04.2023
vanita
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes No
Whether Reportable : Yes No
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:049898
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!