Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10916 P&H
Judgement Date : 9 September, 2022
CRM-M-40865 of 2022 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-40865 of 2022
DATE OF DECISION :- September 09, 2022
Rajinder Kaur ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. MADAAN
Present:- Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate for the petitioner.
***
This is second petition for grant of pre-arrest bail filed on
behalf of petitioner Rajinder Kaur in case F.I.R No. 233 dated 24.7.2020 for
offences under Sections 420, 406, 120-B IPC registered with Police station
Haibowal, Ludhiana. The first such petition was dismissed by this Court
vide detailed order dated 12.01.2021, copy of which has been placed on
record as Annexure P-5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has
come to this Court seeking pre-arrest bail on account of change in
circumstances since the matter has been compromised between the parties.
May it be so. The Hon'ble Apex Court in recent judgment G.R.
Ananda Babu Versus The State of Tamil Nadu & Anr. arising out of SLP
(Crl.) No. 213 of 2021 has observed as under :
"As a matter of fact, successive anticipatory bail applications
ought not to be entertained and more so, when the case diary
and the status report, clearly indicated that the accused
(respondent No. 2) is absconding and not cooperating with the
1 of 2
investigation. The specious reason of change in circumstances
cannot be invoked for successive anticipatory bail
applications, once it is rejected by a speaking order and that
too by the same Judge."
Therefore, the present petition is not maintainable and stands
dismissed accordingly.
(H.S. MADAAN)
JUDGE
September 09, 2022
p.singh
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!