Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10830 P&H
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2022
127 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
RSA-3769-2019 (O&M)
Date of decision: 08.09.2022
Giani Ram and others
....Appellants
Versus
Smt. Luxmi Devi and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. Rajnish Gupta, Advocate for Mr.J.P.Sharma, Advocate for the appellants
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J (Oral)
The defendants assail the concurrent findings of fact arrived
at by the the First Appellate Court. The previous suit filed by the
plaintiffs for grant of decree of possession was decreed on 12.12.1993.
The aforesaid judgment and decree was uploaded by the High Court on
its official website on 10.02.2010. In the execution of the warrants of
possession, the possession of the property was delivered to the plaintiffs.
They filed the present suit for grant of permanent injunction restraining
the defendants from interfering in his peaceful possession. The trial
court dismissed the suit on the ground that plaintiff no.4 in violation of
the injunction order has sold the property. The First Appellate Court
reversed the aforesaid findings.
Heard the learned counsel representing the appellant at
length and with his able assistance perused the paperbook. He contends
that the first appeal was filed by plaintiff no. 5 & 6 and not by plaintiff
no.1 to 4. It may be noticed that Order XLI Rule 4 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908, enables even one plaintiff to seek reversal of the entire
1 of 2
judgment. No other point was pressed by the learned counsel
representing the appellant.
Hence, no ground to interfere is made out.
Dismissed.
All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
08.09.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL)
rekha JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!