Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10580 P&H
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2022
249 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-40481-2017
Date of Decision: 06.09.2022
AMANPREET KAUR & OTHERS ... PETITIONERS
VS.
STATE OF PUNJAB & ANOTHER .. RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK PURI
Present :
None for the petitioners.
Mr. Hittan Nehra, Additional Advocate General, Punjab.
Mr. Karanveer Singh, Advocate for
Mr. Onkar Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2.
*****
VIVEK PURI, J.(ORAL)
The petitioners are seeking to quash the FIR No. 101 dated
03.07.2017 under Sections 306 and 34 IPC registered at Police Station
Dasuya, District Hoshiarpur.
Learned State counsel, on the instructions fro ASI Harjit Singh,
submits that petitioners No. 2 to 5 were found to be innocent and on
conclusion of investigation, challan has been presented only against petitioner
No.1. It has been further submitted that petitioner No.1 has already been
acquitted in terms of judgment dated 25.11.2019 passed by the Court of
learned Additional Sessions Judge, Hoshiarpur. Consequently, the present
petition has become infructuous.
In view of the categoric assertion made by learned State counsel,
the present petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
However, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners. They
shall be at liberty to move an application for revival of the petition within a
period of three months, if the aforesaid assertion of learned State counsel is
found to be factually incorrect.
06.09.2022 (VIVEK PURI)
smriti JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
1 of 1
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!