Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 10566 P&H
Judgement Date : 6 September, 2022
142 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
RA-RS-37-2022
in
RSA-1012-2019
Date of decision: 06.09.2022
Smt. Veena Chaudhary and others ....Appellants
Versus
Mrs. Birwati Chaudhary and another
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. V.K.Jindal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akshay Jindal, Advocate for the review applicants
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J (Oral)
Through this review application, review of detailed
judgment and decree dated 04.07.2022 passed in RSA-799-2019, RSA-
1012-2019 and CR-406-2020 has been sought.
Learned counsel representing the review applicants while
referring to the statement of Mr. Pardeep submits that an amount of
Rs.5,00,000/- was paid by him to Sh.J.S.Luthra, without any reference to
Rs.25000/- which was paid by his father late Sh. Prem Singh Luthra.
This Court has relied upon the statement of Sh.J.S.Luthra,
the owner of the property. He admits receipt of the entire sale
consideration from late Sh.Prem Singh. The statement of his son has to
be read in that context. Hence, no ground to review is made out.
Dismissed.
All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
06.09.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) rekha JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
1 of 1
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!