Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sikander And Ors vs Board Of School Education Haryana ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 14491 P&H

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 14491 P&H
Judgement Date : 16 November, 2022

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Sikander And Ors vs Board Of School Education Haryana ... on 16 November, 2022
110+238
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

                                                CM-17850-CWP-2022 in/and
                                                CWP-22467-2020
                                                Date of Decision: 16.11.2022
Sikander and others
                                                                  ....Petitioners
                                           VS

Board of School Education Haryana Bhiwani
                                                                  ....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR MITTAL

Present:-     Mr. Yogesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners
        Mr. K.K. Gupta, Advocate for the respondent
                                      *****
SUDHIR MITTAL, J. (Oral)

CM No. 17850-CWP-2022

This application has been filed for placing on record rejoinder to the

reply filed on behalf of the respondent alongwith Annexure P-4.

For the reasons stated therein, application is allowed and rejoinder

aforementioned alongwith Annexure P-4 is taken on record.

CWP-22467-2020

The petitioners were desirous of joining the Central Armed Police

Forces. It seems that age was coming in their way and they came in contact with

one Parmanand son of Kehar Singh who assured them that he would get them

forged Class X and Class XII certificates in which their date of birth would be

changed and, accordingly, they would be able to get selected. Certificates with

changed dates of birth were infact issued by the respondent but the fraud came to

light resulting in registration of an FIR against said Parmanand and the petitioners

in the year 2020. Thereafter, the respondent wrote a communication dated

14.08.2020 to the petitioners directing them to deposit the certificates issued later.

These have since been submitted and the original certificates (with correct dates of

birth) have not been given to the petitioners. Thus, the present writ petition has

been filed.

                                       1 of 2

 CWP-22467-2020 (O&M)                                                             -2-

Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the certificates were

obtained by forging as many as 172 judgments and decrees. This was highlighted

by the then District Judge of Panipat vide his communication dated 26.02.2020.

The entire record has been taken away by the police and, thus, the originals can not

be given to the petitioners. Moreover, the petitioners have committed a criminal

act and this dis-entitles them to issuance of the original certificates.

In rebuttal, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that some of the

petitioners have created 'digi locker' in which the details of their Class X/Class XII

examination have been uploaded by the Board and, thus, the submission that the

record has been taken away by the police is false.

Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the respondent submits

that the 'digi locker' was updated because the relevant details were available with

the Board. The original certificates have, however, been cancelled and are in

police custody.

Undoubtedly, the petitioners have committed a criminal act in

conspiracy with Parmanand son of Kehar Singh, yet, they can not be denied

issuance of their original Class X/Class XII certificates. The submission that the

record is not available has been falsified and learned counsel for the respondent has

admitted as such. Thus, the writ petition is allowed. The respondent is directed to

issue duplicates of the original Class X and Class XII certificates to the petitioners

within eight weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

Nothing stated hereinabove shall be constructed as an opinion on the

merits of the criminal case.


                                                            ( SUDHIR MITTAL )
16.11.2022                                                       JUDGE
reena

                    Whether speaking/reasoned               Yes/No
                    Whether Reportable :                    Yes/No

                                       2 of 2

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter