Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2371 P&H
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2022
118 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
RERA-Appeal 40-2021 (O&M)
Date of decision: 31.03.2022
M/s Omaxe India Pvt. Ltd.
....Appellant
Versus
Sandeep Goyal and another
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate for the appellant
Mr. Rajiv Atma Ram, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Bhagoti Singh, Advocate for the respondents
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J (Oral)
The Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Panchkula,
has started deciding various issues involved in a complaint vide separate
orders. The Haryana Real Estate Appellate Tribunal after taking note of
the various facts and judgments passed by the courts held that it would
be more appropriate if the authority decides the matter by one order in a
comprehensive manner. However, the Appellate Authority dismissed
the appeal filed by the appellant.
Learned senior counsel representing the respondents has
submitted that he has no objection if the order passed by the Regulatory
authority as well as the Appellate Tribunal are set aside with a direction
to the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Panchkula, to re-
decide the matter afresh within a period of three months. He has no
objection if the matter is decided comprehensively deciding all the
issues.
Learned counsel representing the appellant has no objection
thereto.
1 of 2
In view of the aforesaid consensus arrived at, the Haryana
Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Panchkula, is directed to decide the
matter comprehensively within a period of three months, positively from
today.
Disposed of.
All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
31.03.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL)
rekha JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!