Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2046 P&H
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2022
235 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CR-5684-2018
Date of decision: 24.03.2022
Satpal ...........Petitioner
versus
Jangir Kaur and another .......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH
Present: Mr. Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Suvir Sidhu, Advocate
for the respondents.
FATEH DEEP SINGH, J. (ORAL)
Due to outbreak of pandemic COVID-19, the instant
case is being taken up for hearing through video conferencing.
Mr. Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate for the petitioner
and Mr. Suvir Sidhu, Advocate for the respondents-decree holder
have made a joint statement undertaking that against
judgment/decree dated 10.04.2004 so passed an RSA-910-2007
titled as 'Satpal versus Jangir Kaur and another' is pending before
this Court and that the decree holder shall not press with the execution application till the decision of the RSA by this Court. However,
1 of 2
learned counsel for the petitioner does not object if the bank
guarantee, so furnished, before the Executing Court on the basis of
order dated 26.09.2007 passed by the learned ACJ (Senior
Division), Faridkot, remains in operation and holds good till then
and which would be renewed from time to time by the Executing
Court till the decision of the RSA by this Court.
In light of the same, an undertaking by way of
settlement before this Court, learned counsel for the petitioner
withdraws the present civil revision without prejudice to the rights
of the petitioner before this Court in the RSA. The party shall be
bound by these statements.
The civil revision stands disposed off accordingly.
(FATEH DEEP SINGH)
24.03.2022 JUDGE
Neha
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!