Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1408 P&H
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2022
202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
RSA-3710-1998 (O&M)
Date of decision: 09.03.2022
Gurmej Singh and others
....Appellants
Versus
Ranbir Singh and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
Present: Mr. C.B.Goel and Mr. Rajinder Goel, Advocates for the appellants Mr. Inderjeet Singh, Advocate for respondent no.2
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J (Oral)
The appellants are the plaintiffs in a suit for grant of decree
of declaration to the effect that the alienation made by their father was
without legal necessity. Both the courts, on appreciation of evidence,
have concurrently found that the sale was due to legal necessity and the
plaintiffs failed to prove that such sale was not for valid consideration.
Heard learned counsel representing the parties at length and
with their able assistance perused the paper book. Learned counsel
representing the appellants contends that both the courts have recorded a
finding that the sale deed was executed for legal necessity.
It is evident from the reading of the judgment passed by the
learned First Appellate Court that the land in question was under a
mortgage for an amount of Rs.13,000/-. The total sale consideration was
Rs.28,000/-. It has also come on record that Jagir Singh, the vendor
required the money for repayment of the mortgage amount, purchase of
a diesel engine of a tubewell and the marriage expenses of his niece.
1 of 2
Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, no ground to interfere
is made out.
Hence, dismissed.
All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also
disposed of.
09.03.2022 (ANIL KSHETARPAL)
rekha JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!