Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sita Rani @ Seeta vs Ravi Verma
2022 Latest Caselaw 7976 P&H

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7976 P&H
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2022

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Sita Rani @ Seeta vs Ravi Verma on 28 July, 2022
TA No.775 of 2022 (O&M)
                                                                         1

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                    CHANDIGARH

                                             TA No.775 of 2022 (O&M)
                                            Date of decision: 28.07.2022

Sita Rani @ Seeta
                                                             ....Petitioner
                                  Versus
Ravi Verma
                                                           ....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN

Present: Mr. Amandeep Saini, Advocate for the petitioner.

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)

Prayer in this petition is for transfer of the petition filed

under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending in the Family

Court, Ludhiana to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Camp Court

Kharar, District S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali.

Counsel for the petitioner has argued that on account of a

matrimonial discord, the petitioner has filed a petition under Section

125 Cr.P.C. and also got registered an FIR under Section 376 at Camp

Court Kharar, District S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali.

Counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the

respondent/husband has filed the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu

Marriage Act, as a counter-blast, before the Principal Judge, Family

Court, Ludhiana.

Counsel for the petitioner has also argued that on account

of a petition filed by the respondent/husband, the petitioner is facing

great difficulty in prosecuting the said case as there is a distance of

about 85 Kms from Camp Court Kharar, District S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali

1 of 4

TA No.775 of 2022 (O&M)

to Ludhiana.

Counsel for the petitioner has further contended that the

petitioner is having a minor child, who is living in her care and custody

and she is facing difficulty to defend the case as she has to travel from

Camp Court Kharar, District S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali to Ludhiana.

Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgments

"Sumita Singh vs Kumar Sanjay", 2002 SC 396 and "Rajani Kishor

Pardeshi vs Kishor Babulal Pardeshi", 2005(12) SCC 237, wherein

the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that while deciding the

transfer application, the Courts are required to give more weightage

and consideration to the convenience of the female litigants and

transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to another should

ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their convenience and

the Courts should desist from putting female litigants under undue

hardships."

It is well settled that while considering the transfer of a

matrimonial dispute/case at the instance of the wife, the Court is to

consider the family condition of the wife, the custody of the minor

child, economic condition of the wife, her physical health and earning

capacity of the husband and most important the convenience of the wife

i.e. she cannot travel alone without assistance of a male member of her

family, connectivity of the place to and fro from her place of residence

as well as bearing of the litigation charges and travelling expenses.

After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, considering the

fact that issuance of notice to the respondent has the consequences of

staying further proceedings before the trial Court, otherwise the

2 of 4

TA No.775 of 2022 (O&M)

petitioner/wife will have to bear the litigation expenses and

transportation expenses and in case, notice of motion is issued, even the

respondent/husband has to bear the litigation expenses and in view of

the judgments i.e. Sumita Singh's case (supra) and Rajani Kishor

Pardeshi's case (supra) passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this

Court deem it appropriate to allow the present petition, subject to the

following conditions:-

1. The petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending before the Family Court, Ludhiana will be transferred to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Camp Court Kharar, District S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali.

2. The District Judge, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali, will assign the said petition to the competent Court of jurisdiction.

3. The Family Court, Ludhiana is directed to transfer all the record pertaining to the aforesaid case to District Judge, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali.

4. The parties are directed to appear before the trial Court, Camp Court Kharar, District S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali, within a period of 01 month from today.

However, liberty is granted to the respondent to revive this

petition, if he intent to contest the same, provided that:-

(a) The respondent will clear all arrears of maintenance amount, if any, in terms of a petition filed by the petitioner either under Section 125 Cr.P.C. or Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act or Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

(b) The respondent will file an affidavit giving undertaking to pay Rs.1,000/- per day, to the petitioner for attending the Court proceedings at Ludhiana, on each and every date of hearing.

(c) The respondent will bring a demand draft of Rs.25,000/-

3 of 4

TA No.775 of 2022 (O&M)

towards the litigation expenses of the petitioner to pursue the case at Ludhiana in case the respondent opt to contest this petition.

Disposed of.

(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE

28.07.2022 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No

Whether reportable: Yes/No

4 of 4

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter