Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7799 P&H
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2022
TA No.748 of 2022 (O&M)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
TA No.748 of 2022 (O&M)
Date of decision: 26.07.2022
Anubha Vaid
....Petitioner
Versus
Rajeev Vaid
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Vikram Preet Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for transfer of the petition filed
under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending in the Family
Court, Faridabad to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Ambala.
Counsel for the petitioner has argued that on account of a
matrimonial discord, the petitioner has filed a petition under Section
125 Cr.P.C. and a petition/complaint under the Domestic Violence Act
at Ambala.
Counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the
respondent/husband has filed the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu
Marriage Act, as a counter-blast, before the Principal Judge, Family
Court, Faridabad.
Counsel for the petitioner has also argued that on account
of a petition filed by the respondent/husband, the petitioner is facing
great difficulty in prosecuting the said case as there is a distance of
about 200 Kms from Ambala to Faridabad.
Counsel for the petitioner has further contended that the
1 of 3
TA No.748 of 2022 (O&M)
petitioner is having 02 minor daughters, who are living in her care and
custody and she is facing difficulty to defend the case as she has to
travel from Ambala to Faridabad.
Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgments
"Sumita Singh vs Kumar Sanjay", 2002 SC 396 and "Rajani Kishor
Pardeshi vs Kishor Babulal Pardeshi", 2005(12) SCC 237, wherein
the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that while deciding the
transfer application, the Courts are required to give more weightage
and consideration to the convenience of the female litigants and
transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to another should
ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their convenience and
the Courts should desist from putting female litigants under undue
hardships."
It is well settled that while considering the transfer of a
matrimonial dispute/case at the instance of the wife, the Court is to
consider the family condition of the wife, the custody of the minor
child, economic condition of the wife, her physical health and earning
capacity of the husband and most important the convenience of the wife
i.e. she cannot travel alone without assistance of a male member of her
family, connectivity of the place to and fro from her place of residence
as well as bearing of the litigation charges and travelling expenses.
After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, considering the
fact that issuance of notice to the respondent has the consequences of
staying further proceedings before the trial Court, otherwise the
petitioner/wife will have to bear the litigation expenses and
transportation expenses and in case, notice of motion is issued, even the
2 of 3
TA No.748 of 2022 (O&M)
respondent/husband has to bear the litigation expenses and in view of
the judgments i.e. Sumita Singh's case (supra) and Rajani Kishor
Pardeshi's case (supra) passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this
Court deem it appropriate to allow the present petition, subject to the
following conditions:-
1. The petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending before the Family Court, Faridabad will be transferred to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Ambala.
2. The District Judge, Ambala, will assign the said petition to the competent Court of jurisdiction.
3. The Family Court, Faridabad is directed to transfer all the record pertaining to the aforesaid case to District Judge, Ambala.
4. The parties are directed to appear before the trial Court, Ambala, within a period of 01 month from today.
However, liberty is granted to the respondent to revive this
petition, if he intent to contest the same, provided that:-
(a) The respondent will clear all arrears of maintenance amount, if any, in terms of a petition filed by the petitioner either under Section 125 Cr.P.C. or Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act or Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
(b) The respondent will file an affidavit giving undertaking to pay Rs.1,000/- per day, to the petitioner for attending the Court proceedings at Faridabad, on each and every date of hearing.
(c) The respondent will bring a demand draft of Rs.25,000/-
towards the litigation expenses of the petitioner to pursue the case at Faridabad in case the respondent opt to contest this petition.
Disposed of.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN) JUDGE
26.07.2022 yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!