Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7707 P&H
Judgement Date : 25 July, 2022
TA-744-2022 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
TA-744-2022 (O&M)
Date of decision: 25.07.2022
Kamaljit Kaur
....Petitioner
Vs.
Pardeep Singh
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Achin Gupta, Advocate
for the petitioner.
*******
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for transfer of the petition filed by the
respondent-husband under Section 13(i-a)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act,
pending in the Court of Family Court, Ludhiana to the competent Court of
jurisdiction at Faridkot.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that on an earlier
occasion, similar petition filed by the respondent at Ludhiana was
transferred to Faridkot by this Court vide order dated 04.07.2019 passed in
TA-1060-2018. Later on, the matter was compromised, however, the
respondent has again filed a petition at Ludhiana and on account of the
same, the petitioner is facing great difficulty in prosecuting the said case, as
1 of 4
there is a distance of about 120 kms between Faridkot and Ludhiana.
Learned counsel has relied upon the judgments Sumita Singh
Vs. Kumar Sanjay, 2002 SC 396 and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi Vs. Kishor
Babulal Pardeshi, 2005(12) SCC 237, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court
observed that while deciding the transfer application, the Courts are
required to give more weightage and consideration to the convenience of
the female litigants and transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to
another should ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their
convenience and the Courts should desist from putting female litigants
under undue hardships."
It is well settled that while considering the transfer of a
matrimonial dispute/case at the instance of the wife, the Court is to consider
family condition of the wife, custody of the minor child, economic condition
of the wife, her physical health and earning capacity of the husband and
most important, convenience of the wife i.e. she cannot travel alone without
assistance of a male member of her family, connectivity of the place to and
fro from her place of residence as well as bearing of the litigation charges
and travelling expenses.
After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, considering the fact
that issuance of notice to the respondent has the consequences of staying
further proceedings before the trial Court, otherwise the petitioner-wife will
have to bear the litigation expenses and transportation expenses and in view
2 of 4
of the fact that even in case notice of motion is issued, even the
respondent/husband has to bear the litigation expenses and in view of the
judgments in Sumita Singh's case (supra) and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi's
case (supra) passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court deem it
appropriate to allow the present petition, subject to the following
conditions:-
1. The petition filed under Section 13(i-a)(i-b) of the Hindu
Marriage Act, pending before the Family Court, Ludhiana will
be transferred to the competent Court of jurisdiction at
Faridkot.
2. The District Judge, Faridkot, will assign the said petition to
the competent Court of jurisdiction.
3. The Family Court, Ludhiana is directed to transfer all the
record pertaining to the aforesaid case(s) to District Judge,
Faridkot.
4. The parties are directed to appear before the Family Court,
Faridkot within a period of 01 month from today.
However, liberty is granted to the respondent to revive this
petition, if he intent to contest the same, provided that:-
(a) The respondent will clear all arrears of maintenance amount,
if any, in terms of a petition filed by the petitioner either under
Section 125 Cr.P.C. or Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act
3 of 4
or Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
(b) The respondent will file an affidavit giving undertaking to pay
Rs.1,000/- per day, to the petitioner for attending the Court
proceedings at Ludhiana, on each and every date of hearing.
(c) The respondent will bring a demand draft of Rs.25,000/-
towards the litigation expenses of the petitioner to pursue the
case at Ludhiana, in case the respondent opt to contest this
petition.
Present petition is disposed of accordingly.
[ ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN ] JUDGE 25.07.2022 vishnu
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
4 of 4
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!