Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kamaljit Kaur vs Pardeep Singh
2022 Latest Caselaw 7707 P&H

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7707 P&H
Judgement Date : 25 July, 2022

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Kamaljit Kaur vs Pardeep Singh on 25 July, 2022
TA-744-2022                                                        -1-



       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                      CHANDIGARH

                                                TA-744-2022 (O&M)
                                                Date of decision: 25.07.2022

Kamaljit Kaur
                                                                   ....Petitioner



                                          Vs.

Pardeep Singh
                                                                 ....Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN

Present:     Mr. Achin Gupta, Advocate
             for the petitioner.

                    *******

ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (Oral)

Prayer in this petition is for transfer of the petition filed by the

respondent-husband under Section 13(i-a)(i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act,

pending in the Court of Family Court, Ludhiana to the competent Court of

jurisdiction at Faridkot.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that on an earlier

occasion, similar petition filed by the respondent at Ludhiana was

transferred to Faridkot by this Court vide order dated 04.07.2019 passed in

TA-1060-2018. Later on, the matter was compromised, however, the

respondent has again filed a petition at Ludhiana and on account of the

same, the petitioner is facing great difficulty in prosecuting the said case, as

1 of 4

there is a distance of about 120 kms between Faridkot and Ludhiana.

Learned counsel has relied upon the judgments Sumita Singh

Vs. Kumar Sanjay, 2002 SC 396 and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi Vs. Kishor

Babulal Pardeshi, 2005(12) SCC 237, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court

observed that while deciding the transfer application, the Courts are

required to give more weightage and consideration to the convenience of

the female litigants and transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to

another should ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their

convenience and the Courts should desist from putting female litigants

under undue hardships."

It is well settled that while considering the transfer of a

matrimonial dispute/case at the instance of the wife, the Court is to consider

family condition of the wife, custody of the minor child, economic condition

of the wife, her physical health and earning capacity of the husband and

most important, convenience of the wife i.e. she cannot travel alone without

assistance of a male member of her family, connectivity of the place to and

fro from her place of residence as well as bearing of the litigation charges

and travelling expenses.

After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, considering the fact

that issuance of notice to the respondent has the consequences of staying

further proceedings before the trial Court, otherwise the petitioner-wife will

have to bear the litigation expenses and transportation expenses and in view

2 of 4

of the fact that even in case notice of motion is issued, even the

respondent/husband has to bear the litigation expenses and in view of the

judgments in Sumita Singh's case (supra) and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi's

case (supra) passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court deem it

appropriate to allow the present petition, subject to the following

conditions:-

1. The petition filed under Section 13(i-a)(i-b) of the Hindu

Marriage Act, pending before the Family Court, Ludhiana will

be transferred to the competent Court of jurisdiction at

Faridkot.

2. The District Judge, Faridkot, will assign the said petition to

the competent Court of jurisdiction.

3. The Family Court, Ludhiana is directed to transfer all the

record pertaining to the aforesaid case(s) to District Judge,

Faridkot.

4. The parties are directed to appear before the Family Court,

Faridkot within a period of 01 month from today.

However, liberty is granted to the respondent to revive this

petition, if he intent to contest the same, provided that:-

(a) The respondent will clear all arrears of maintenance amount,

if any, in terms of a petition filed by the petitioner either under

Section 125 Cr.P.C. or Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act

3 of 4

or Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

(b) The respondent will file an affidavit giving undertaking to pay

Rs.1,000/- per day, to the petitioner for attending the Court

proceedings at Ludhiana, on each and every date of hearing.

(c) The respondent will bring a demand draft of Rs.25,000/-

towards the litigation expenses of the petitioner to pursue the

case at Ludhiana, in case the respondent opt to contest this

petition.

Present petition is disposed of accordingly.

[ ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN ] JUDGE 25.07.2022 vishnu

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable: Yes/No

4 of 4

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter