Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7695 P&H
Judgement Date : 25 July, 2022
TA-741-2022 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
TA-741-2022 (O&M)
Date of decision: 25.07.2022
Kulwant Kaur
....Petitioner
Vs.
Ashwani Kumar and another
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. Vaneet Thakur, Advocate
for the petitioner.
*******
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN, J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for transfer of the petition filed by the
respondent-husband under Sections 7 & 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act,
1890, pending in the Court of Family Court, Jalandhar to the competent
Court of jurisdiction at Hoshiarpur.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that on account
of a matrimonial discord, the petitioner has filed a petition under Section
125 Cr.P.C., which is pending before the Family Court, Hoshiarpur. It is
further submitted that on account of a petition filed by the respondent-
husband, the petitioner is facing great difficulty in prosecuting the said case,
as there is a distance of about 60 kms between Hoshiarpur and Jalandhar.
1 of 4
Learned counsel has further contended that the petitioner is
having two minor children, who are living in her care and custody and she is
facing difficulty to defend the case, as she has to travel from Hoshiarpur to
Jalandhar.
Learned counsel has relied upon the judgments Sumita Singh
Vs. Kumar Sanjay, 2002 SC 396 and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi Vs. Kishor
Babulal Pardeshi, 2005(12) SCC 237, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court
observed that while deciding the transfer application, the Courts are
required to give more weightage and consideration to the convenience of
the female litigants and transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to
another should ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their
convenience and the Courts should desist from putting female litigants
under undue hardships."
It is well settled that while considering the transfer of a
matrimonial dispute/case at the instance of the wife, the Court is to consider
family condition of the wife, custody of the minor child, economic condition
of the wife, her physical health and earning capacity of the husband and
most important, convenience of the wife i.e. she cannot travel alone without
assistance of a male member of her family, connectivity of the place to and
fro from her place of residence as well as bearing of the litigation charges
and travelling expenses.
After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, considering the fact
that issuance of notice to the respondent has the consequences of staying
2 of 4
further proceedings before the trial Court, otherwise the petitioner-wife will
have to bear the litigation expenses and transportation expenses and in view
of the fact that even in case notice of motion is issued, even the
respondent/husband has to bear the litigation expenses and in view of the
judgments in Sumita Singh's case (supra) and Rajani Kishor Pardeshi's
case (supra) passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court deem it
appropriate to allow the present petition, subject to the following
conditions:-
1. The petition filed under Section 7 & 25 of the Guardians and
Wards Act, 1890, pending before the Family Court, Jalandhar
will be transferred to the competent Court of jurisdiction at
Hoshiarpur.
2. The District Judge, Hoshiarpur, will assign the said petition to
the competent Court of jurisdiction.
3. The Family Court, Jalandhar is directed to transfer all the
record pertaining to the aforesaid case(s) to District Judge,
Hoshiarpur.
4. The parties are directed to appear before the Family Court,
Hoshiarpur within a period of 01 month from today.
However, liberty is granted to the respondent to revive this
petition, if he intent to contest the same, provided that:-
(a) The respondent will clear all arrears of maintenance amount,
if any, in terms of a petition filed by the petitioner either under
3 of 4
Section 125 Cr.P.C. or Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act
or Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
(b) The respondent will file an affidavit giving undertaking to pay
Rs.1,000/- per day, to the petitioner for attending the Court
proceedings at Jalandhar, on each and every date of hearing.
(c) The respondent will bring a demand draft of Rs.25,000/-
towards the litigation expenses of the petitioner to pursue the
case at Jalandhar, in case the respondent opt to contest this
petition.
Present petition is disposed of accordingly.
[ ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN ] JUDGE 25.07.2022 vishnu
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
4 of 4
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!