Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7538 P&H
Judgement Date : 22 July, 2022
FAO-M-204-2018 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
FAO-M-204-2018 (O&M)
Date of Decision: 22.07.2022
Jyoti .......Appellant
Vs.
Brijesh Kumar ........Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA
Present:- Mr. V. K. Sandhir, Advocate, for the appellant.
Mr. V. K. Kaushal, Advocate, for the respondent.
*****
RITU BAHRI, J. (ORAL)
The present appeal has been filed against the judgment and
decree dated 22.05.2018 passed by the Court of learned Additional District
Judge, Amritsar, whereby, the marriage between the appellant and
respondent has been dissolved by way of decree of divorce under Section 13
of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Both the parties alongwith their counsel are present in Court
today.
Both the parties have submitted before this Court that they
have compromised the matter and as per settlement respondent-Brijesh
Kumar has agreed to pay Rs.13,00,000/- as permanent alimony towards past,
present and future maintenance to appellant-Jyoti and her minor child
namely Mayank. It has been agreed between the parties that custody of the
minor child Mayank shall remain with the mother i.e. appellant-Jyoti and
respondent shall never claim in this regard. Statements of both the parties to
this effect has been recorded in Court today which are duly signed by the
1 of 2
parties and identified by their respective counsel. As per statements of both
the parties, respondent-Brijesh Kumar, handed over Rs.13,00,000/- to the
appellant-Jyoti towards her past, present and future maintenance and for the
maintenance of the minor child. Out of the said amount, an amount of Rs.
3,00,000/- has been given in cash to the appellant-Jyoti and two drafts
bearing Nos.066608 dated 15.07.2022 and 410059 dated 11.07.2022 of Rs.
5,00,000/- each, have been issued in favour of minor son Mayank and
appellant-Jyoti respectively and handed over the same to the appellant-Jyoti.
As per statements made by both the parties, custody of the minor son shall
remain with the appellant-Jyoti and respondent-Brijesh Kumar shall not
claim the custody of the minor child-Mayank. Statements of both the parties
are annexed with this appeal as Annexure R-1.
In view of the above, nothing survives in the present appeal and
appellant seeks to withdraw the same.
Ordered accordingly.
(RITU BAHRI)
JUDGE
(MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA)
22.07.2022 JUDGE
anil
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!