Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6514 P&H
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2022
258 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-8689-2020
Date of decision : 11.07.2022
SUNNY CHAWLA
... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Sidakmeet Singh Sandhu, DAG, Punjab.
****
JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (ORAL)
The prayer in the present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
is for the issuance of appropriate directions to respondent Nos.2 and the
connected Police Stations of District Amritsar not to harass and
humiliate the petitioner by calling him to the different Police Stations
time and again, with a further prayer that respondent Nos.2 and 3 be
directed to provide at least 10 days time for his appearance while serving
a notice under Section 160 Cr.P.C.
None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
The learned State counsel submits that the petitioner is a
habitual offender and the allegations levelled in the petition are baseless.
1 of 3
In fact, as many as 11 more FIRs are pending against the petitioner, the
details of which are mentioned hereinbelow:-
Sr. Detail of case Status No.
1. FIR No.5 dated 08.01.2015, P.S. FIR quashed vide order dated 26.02.2018 Islamabad, U/s 452, 341, 323, 506, 34 of IPC
2. FIR No.81/4.10.2019, PS D- Petitioner acquitted vide judgment dated Division, U/s 392 IPC 05.02.2013
3. FIR No.70 dated 04.03.2014, P.S. The petitioner is not involved and not Islamabad, U/s 326/323/324 IPC mentioned as accused in the said FIR
4. FIR No.83/26.6.2017 P.S. FIR quashed vide order dated 11.10.2017 Islamabad U/s 382, 323, 324, 341, 148, 149 IPC
5. FIR No.33 dated 26.04.2016, P.S. FIR quashed vide order dated 06.07.2018 Islamabad U/s 366 IPC
6. FIR No.5 dated 20.01.2016, P.S. Compromise effected and quashing Islamabad, U/s 379-B, 323, 325 petition is pending in the Hon'ble High IPC Court vide CRM-M-25319-2018
7. FIR No.80/2013, P.S. Islamabad, The FIR has been recommended for U/s 364 IPC cancellation.
8. FIR No.39 dated 26.05.2012, P.S. The petitioner acquitted vide judgment Islamabad, U/s 452, 328, 323, dated 01.09.2018. 324 IPC.
9. FIR No.34 dated 20.02.2010, P.S. The petitioner acquitted vide judgment Islamabad, U/s 452, 380, 427, dated 03.09.2012. 506, 323, 324, 326, 148, 149 IPC
10. FIR No.198 dated 21.10.2019, On bail u/s 167 (2) Cr.P.C. as the police P.S. Gate Hakima, Amritsar, in failed to collect any cogent evidence which the petitioner was involved against the petitioner. vide GD No.01 dated 24.10.2019 U/s 452, 323, 427, 336, 506, 148, 149 of IPC read with Sections 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act, 1959.
11. FIR No.113 dated 14.11.2019, Cancellation has been submitted and on U/s 379-B(2) IPC P.S. 'D' the application of the SHO the release Division, Amritsar order of the petitioner were passed by JMIC, ASR.
He further submits that the presence of the petitioner was
being sought in FIR No.198 dated 21.10.2019 registered under Sections
307, 148, 149 IPC and Sections 25, 27, 54 of Arms Act, 1959 registered
at Police Station Gate Hakima, District Amritsar in GD No.01 dated
2 of 3
24.10.2019 registered under Sections 452, 323, 427, 336, 506, 148, 149
IPC read with Sections 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act.
In view of the above and the criminal antecedents of the
petitioner, no further orders are required to be passed by this Court.
Disposed of.
(JASJIT SINGH BEDI) JUDGE 11.07.2022 JITESH
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No
Whether reportable:- Yes/No
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!