Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6449 P&H
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2022
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana
At Chandigarh
CRM-M-27067-2022 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-8.7.2022
Davinder Singh @ Bunti ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:- Mr. Aseem Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tanvir Joshi, AAG, Punjab.
*****
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.(Oral)
CRM-22308-2022
In view of the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is
allowed and the document annexed with the application is taken on record as
Annexure P-7 subject to all just exceptions.
CRM-M-27067-2022 (Main Case)
The petitioner has approached this Court challenging order
dated 18.5.2022 (Annexure P-4) passed by learned Judge, Special Court,
Fatehgarh Sahib, whereby his bail has been cancelled by the Trial Court on
account of his absence on 18.5.2022.
This Court does not find any illegality in impugned order dated
18.5.2022 (Annexure P-4), which was passed by the Court upon absence of
accused/petitioner on the date fixed, which would be in violation of
conditions of the bail bonds/surety bonds. The order, as such, is upheld.
1 of 2
(2) CRM-M-27067-2022 (O&M)
It is, however, directed that in case the petitioner surrenders
before the Trial Court within 10 days from today and moves an application
for grant of regular bail, the Trial Court shall consider the same expeditiously
while taking into account the observations made in concluding paragraph of
judgment passed by this Court in CRM-M-39172 of 2021 titled Pawan
Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and another decided on 21.9.2021, which reads
as under:
"12. Before parting with this order, it needs to be added that this Court cannot lose sight of the fact that there would be certain cases where an accused is unable to appear before the trial Court on account of genuine reasons, say on account of having noted the date incorrectly or on account of certain reasons which are beyond his control. In such cases, the accused can surrender before the trial Court and it is expected that the trial Courts would take a lenient view in genuine cases and decide the regular bail application expeditiously. In a given set of circumstances where the trial Court is satisfied that there were valid reasons for the absence of an accused and that he has surrendered at the shortest possible time, the trial Court can in fact dispose of the regular bail application on the very day the same is presented by accused upon his surrender. The trial Court, in its discretion, may also chose to grant interim bail, in fit cases, but only after surrender of accused."
The petition stands disposed off accordingly.
8.7.2022 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill )
pankaj Judge
Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No
Whether Reportable Yes / No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!