Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6387 P&H
Judgement Date : 7 July, 2022
116
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Civil Revision No. 7600 of 2018
Date of Decision: 07.07.2022
Dhan Singh
... Petitioner(s)
Versus
Deepi and Others
... Respondent(s)
CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal.
Present: Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate
for the petitioner(s).
Anil Kshetarpal, J.
1. The petitioner's execution petition under Order XXI Rule 32
CPC has been dismissed by both the Courts below. The aforesaid execution
petition was filed by the petitioner while complaining that a decree for
permanent injunction passed in his favour has been willfully violated. The
decree, so passed, was with respect to a plot in residential area of the village
and the trial Court restrained the defendants from interfering in possession of
the plaintiff. The execution petition was filed complaining that the
defendants, in the suit (judgment debtors in the execution petition), have
forcibly constructed a passage through the suit land.
2. Both the Courts below, on appreciation of evidence, have found
that the petitioner has failed to prove that the passage was constructed after
the decree was passed which is sine qua non for initiating the proceedings
under Order XXI Rule 32 CPC. In fact, it has come on record that the Sub
Divisional Magistrate in its order passed in the year 2003vhas recorded that
the passage/road is in existence.
1 of 2
3. In view of the aforesaid facts, no ground is made out to
interfere. Hence, the present revision petition is dismissed.
(Anil Kshetarpal) Judge July 07, 2022 "DK"
Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!