Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 6164 P&H
Judgement Date : 5 July, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
232
FAO-M-12-2021 (O&M)
Date of decision : 05.07.2022
Satish Kumar Appellant
V/S
Nirmaljeet Respondent
CORAM : HONBLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR VERMA
Present: Mr. Ankur Malik, Advocate
for the appellant.
Mr. Tapish Gupta, Advocate for
Mr. Puja Chopra, Advocate
for the respondent.
****
RITU BAHRI, J. (ORAL)
The present appeal has been filed by the appellant-husband
against the judgment dated 09.03.2021 passed by the Incharge, District
Judge, Ferozepur whereby the petition under Section 13(1) (ib) of the
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act') filed by the appellant-
husband for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty and
desertion was dismissed.
In the present case, the marriage between the parties was
solemnized on 16.02.2014 as per Hindu rites at Ferozepur. There is
no child from this marriage. On account of temperamental differences,
they could not pull along together and started living separately. The
appellant-husband had filed petition under Section 13(1) (ib) of the Act
for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty and desertion
which was dismissed vide impugned judgment dated 09.03.2021.
1 of 3
Against the said judgment, the appellant-husband has preferred the
instant appeal.
Notice of motion in the present appeal was issued on
22.04.2021. On 18.02.2022, Mr. Sachin Jain, Advocate was appointed
as Mediator and the parties were directed to appear before the Mediator
on 02.03.2022. As per the report dated 02.03.2022 of the Mediator, the
parties have amicably settled their dispute. As per the
settlement/compromise dated 02.03.2022, the appellant-husband has
agreed to pay an amount of Rs.13,00,000/- as full and final settlement
towards permanent alimony to the respondent-wife and the parties are
ready to dissolve their marriage under Section 13-B of the Act.
On 29.04.2022 the appellant-husband had handed over a
demand draft of Rs.8,00,000/- and Rs.10,000/- cash to the respondent-
wife and the parties have recorded their first motion statements. On
25.05.2022 the appellant-husband had handed over a demand draft of
Rs.4,90,000/- to learned counsel for the respondent-wife, as the
respondent was not present in the Court. Second motion statement of
the husband was also recorded on that date.
The parties are present in Court today. Learned counsel for
the respondent-wife submits that inadvertently in the
settlement/compromise dated 02.03.2022, reference of 02 criminal
complaints initiated by the appellant-husband against the respondent-
wife was not mentioned. On which the appellant-husband submits that
he will withdraw the said 02 complaints within 03 weeks. The
respondent-wife also brought a laptop in the Court today which is
handed over to the appellant-husband. Second motion statement of the
2 of 3
respondent-wife has also been recorded.
Since, the statements of the parties have been recorded,
nothing remains due and they have also complied with all the
conditions of settlement/compromise dated 02.03.2022, this Court has
suo motu converted the present appeal into petition under Section 13-B
of the Act for grant of divorce by way of mutual consent and also
allowed the same. The parties are granted divorce by way of mutual
consent and the impugned order dated 09.03.2021, is hereby set aside.
Decree-sheet be prepared, accordingly.
Since, the main appeal has been allowed, therefore, all the
pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE
(ASHOK KUMAR VERMA) JUDGE 05.07.2022 kothiyal Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!