Kuldeep Kaur vs Jaswinder Singh
2022 Latest Caselaw 17612 P&H

T.A.No. 1597 of 2022 (O&M)                      1                       110




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                           AT CHANDIGARH

                                     Transfer Application No. 1597 of 2022
                                               Date of decision: 23.12.2022


Kuldeep Kaur

                                                      ..........Petitioner

                                vs

Jaswinder Singh

                                                      ...........Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA

Present:- Mr. Vikram Satpal Anand, Advocate for the petitioner.

NIDHI GUPTA, J.(Oral)

1. Prayer in this petition filed by petitioner-wife is for

transfer of the petition filed by respondent-husband under Section 9

of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 (for short 'the Act') titled "Jaswinder

Singh Vs. Kuldeep Kaur" pending in the Court of Principal Judge,

Family Court, Guruharsahai, District Ferozepur to a Court of

competent jurisdiction at District Ferozepur.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits :-

i) That the parties were married in the year 2013 according to Sikh rites and rituals. This is second marriage of both the parties.

ii) That a male child was born out of this wedlock who is minor and in the care and custody of the petitioner.

1 of 6

iii) That the petitioner-wife is living separately from the respondent-husband since 14.6.2019 and living with her parents at their mercy at District Ferozepur.

iv) That the petitioner is unemployed, having no source of income and totally dependent upon her parents and the respondent-husband is not paying anything to her towards maintenance.

v) That the respondent-husband has filed the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which is pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Guruharsahai, District, Ferozepur

vi) That the proceedings arising out of petitions (as per details given by learned counsel for the petitioner) (1) under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 [COMA-615/2020 titled as 'Kuldeep Kaur vs. Jaswinder Singh, pending for 02.02.2023 before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur]; (2) under Section 125 Cr.P.C. [CRM-693/2022 titled as 'Kuldeep Kaur vs. Jaswinder Singh', pending for 21.01.2023 before the Family Court, Ferozepur]; and (3) petition under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act [MNT-296/2021, titled as 'Kuldeep Kaur vs. Jaswinder Singh', pending for 04.02.2023 before the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Ferozepur] filed by the petitioner-wife, are pending in the Courts having competent jurisdiction at District Ferozepur.

vii) That the distance between place of residence of the petitioner-wife i.e. Village Ichhe Wala, Tehsil and District Ferozepur and the place of proceedings under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 filed by the respondent- husband, pending before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Guruharsahai, is more than 40 kilometers one side.

2 of 6

viii) That there is no proficient male member in the family of petitioner who can accompany her to the Court of proceedings pending at Guruharsahai.

3. It is inter alia on these grounds that petitioner prays for

transfer of the case, as detailed in para 1 above.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The legal position in such like cases as the present one, is

well established. In this regard, judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme

Court rendered in N.C.V. Aishwarya vs A.S. Saravana Karthik

Sha," 2022 Live Law (SC) 627, is most relevant wherein the Hon'ble

Supreme Court has held as under:-

"9. The cardinal principle for exercise of power under section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife's convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer.

10. Further, when two or more proceedings are pending in different Courts between the same parties which raise common question of fact and law, and when the decisions in the cases are interdependent, it is desirable that they should be tried together by the same Judge so as to avoid multiplicity in trial of the same issues and conflict of decisions."

5. Further reliance can be placed upon the judgments in

"Sumita Singh vs Kumar Sanjay", 2002 SC 396 and "Rajani

Kishor Pardeshivs Kishor Babulal Pardeshi", 2005(12) SCC 237,

wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that "while deciding

3 of 6

the transfer application, the Courts are required to give more weightage

and consideration to the convenience of the female litigants and

transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to another should

ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their convenience and

the Courts should desist from putting female litigants under undue

hardships."

6. Even this Court in number of cases has followed the

aforesaid principle of law. Accordingly, it is well settled that while

considering the transfer of a matrimonial dispute/case, at the instance

of the wife, the Court is to consider the family condition of the wife,

the custody of the minor child, economic condition of the wife, her

physical health and earning capacity of the husband and most

important the convenience of the wife i.e. she cannot travel alone

without assistance of a male member of her family, connectivity of the

place to and fro from her place of residence as well as bearing of the

litigation charges and travelling expenses.

7. After going through the entire paper-book, considering the

fact that issuance of notice to the respondent has the consequences of

staying further proceedings before the trial Court, otherwise the

petitioner-wife will have to bear the litigation expenses and

transportation expenses and in case, notice of motion is issued, even

the respondent-husband has to bear the litigation expenses and in view

of the judgments i.e. Sumita Singh's case (supra), Rajani Kishor

Pardeshi's case (supra) and N.C.V. Aishwarya's case (supra) passed

by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court deems it appropriate to

allow the present petition, subject to the following conditions:-

4 of 6

a) The petition filed by respondent husband under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act,1955, bearing No. HMA/56/2021 titled as 'Jaswinder Singh vs. Kuldeep Kaur', pending in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court/Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Divn.), Guruharsahai is transferred to a Court of competent jurisdiction at main Division Ferozepur.

b) The ld. District Judge, Ferozepur is directed to transfer complete record pertaining to the aforesaid case from the Court concerned at Sub Division Guruharsahai to the main Division at Ferozepur.

c) The parties are directed to appear before the District & Sessions Judge, Ferozepur on 21.01.2023.

d) The District Judge, Ferozepur will assign the said petition to the Court of competent jurisdiction.

8. The concerned Court at Ferozepur will make all

endeavour to refer the case before the Mediation and Conciliation

Centre for exploring the possibility of some amicable settlement

between the parties.

9. The Court concerned, where the litigation pending

between the parties, will accommodate them with one date in one

calendar month.

10. However, liberty is granted to the respondent to revive

this petition, if he intends to contest the same, provided that:-

(a) The respondent will clear all arrears of maintenance amount, if any, in terms of any petition filed by the petitioner either under Section 125 Cr.P.C. or Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act or Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.

(b) The respondent will file an affidavit giving undertaking to pay Rs.1,000/- per day, to the

5 of 6

petitioner for attending the Court proceedings at the Court at Sub Division Guruharsahai on each and every date of hearing.

(c) The respondent will bring a demand draft of Rs.25,000/-, drawn in favour of petitioner, towards the litigation expenses to pursue the case at Sub Division Guruharsahai in case the respondent opts to contest this petition.

11. I am supported by the decisions rendered by a Co-ordinate

Bench of this Court in TA No. 1315/2022, Rohini Arora v Nitin

Talwar; TA No. 1322 of 2022, Jaswinder Kaur v Gurvinderjeet

Singh; and TA No. 1323 of 2022, Usha Rani v Karmajit Singh.

12. As already noticed above, since the petition is being

disposed of without issuing notice to the respondent, accordingly, in

these peculiar circumstances, in order to ensure appearance of the

parties before the District Judge, Ferozepur on 21.01.2023, it is

directed that a copy of this order be sent to the respondent through

registered post, besides sending a copy of this order to the District

Judges concerned through e-mail. Petitioner through her counsel,

present in the Court, is directed to ensure her appearance accordingly.

Disposed of.

Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.

December 23, 2022                                     ( NIDHI GUPTA )
Vijay Asija                                                JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned               YES/NO
Whether Reportable                      YES/NO




                                     6 of 6