Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17480 P&H
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2022
CRM-M-59669-2022 -1-
115 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-59669-2022
Date of Decision:20.12.2022
SURINDER KOHLI ......... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr. Saransh Sabharwal, Advocate for
Mr. Sajal Bansal, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
Through instant petition under Section 482 of Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner is seeking quashing of order
dated 11.11.2022 (Annexure P-4) passed by JMIC, Gurugram whereby
bail bonds furnished by the petitioner have been cancelled and non-
bailable warrants of arrest are issued against the petitioner in case
No.NACT/23928/2013 dated 16.04.2012 under Section 138 of
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that
petitioner was regularly appearing in the aforesaid case. Due to wrong
noting of date by counsel, the petitioner failed to appear before Trial
Court on 11.11.2022 and learned Trial Court cancelled bail of the
petitioner and issued non-bailable warrants of arrest. The petitioner since
2013 was regularly appearing before the Trial Court. The petitioner is
not involved in any other FIR. The lapse was unintentional and petitioner
1 of 3
is ready to pay costs of Rs.1,000/-.
Notice of motion.
On the asking of Court, Mr. Karan Sharma, DAG, Haryana
accepts notice on behalf of the State. He does not dispute the above
stated factual position. He has no objection, if petition is disposed of
subject to costs.
Intent of arrest and reason of denial of bail is to secure the
appearance of the accused at the time of trial. A person who seeks to be
liberated must take judgment and serve sentence in the event of his
conviction. The nature of the crime charged, severity of punishment
prescribed, prime facie available evidences, history & background of the
accused may indicate that any amount of bond and surety is not going to
secure presence of accused, at the time of conviction.
Keeping in mind:
i) The object of cancellation of bond or declaration of anyone
as proclaimed offender/person is to secure his presence. The
petitioner has come forward to face trial and undertakes to
appear before trial court on each and every date, thus ,his
presence would meet ends of justice;
ii) The Petitioner for wasting valuable time and energy of
courts as well prosecution is willing to pay costs of Rs.
1,000/-.
iii) The Petitioner is ready to furnish bond/surety to the
satisfaction of the trial court;
iv) The petitioner was initially granted regular bail by learned
Trial Court, Gurugram and thereafter petitioner appeared on
2 of 3
many dates;
v) Trial is pending since 2012 and petitioner is ready to face
trial, thus, no prejudice is going to cause to prosecution or
complainant
vi) The petitioner is accused of commission of bailable and
compoundable offence.
this court is of the considered opinion that present petition
needs to be allowed, and accordingly, petition is allowed. The petitioner
is directed to appear before learned Trial Court on or before 10.01.2023
and on his doing so, the Trial Court shall admit him to bail on furnishing
fresh bail bonds alongwith costs of Rs. 1,000/- to be paid to the
respondent No.2.
Disposed of in above terms.
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL )
JUDGE
20.12.2022
Ali
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!