Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17437 P&H
Judgement Date : 21 December, 2022
CRM-M-56523-2022 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-56523-2022
Date of decision:21.12.2022
Renu
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL
Present: Mr. Rahul Sidher, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tarun Aggarwal, Sr. DAG, Punjab.
Mr. Jasbir Singh Mokri, Advocate for the complainant.
VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
Prayer in this petition under Section 438 Cr.PC is for grant of
anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case bearing FIR No.89 dated
10.11.2022 registered under Sections 306, 34 IPC at PS City-2 Abohar,
District Fazilka, Punjab.
On 05.12.2022, this Court was pleased to pass the following
order:-
"Inter alia contends that Sumit Kumar is the brother-in- law of the deceased; Santosh is the father-in-law of the deceased and Renu is the wife of the deceased and since deceased Paras used to consume liquor/drugs in heavy quantity, thus, there was a dispute in the house and on account of the same, Renu left the house as said Paras used to beat her on many occasions. It is further submitted that Renu gave birth to a baby girl on 11.09.2022 but said Paras had no concern with the said baby. It is stated that the deceased committed suicide on 06.11.2022, whereas, the FIR has been registered after a delay of more than four days i.e. On 10.11.2022 and even as per the alleged whatsapp messages dated 08.07.2022 and 06.11.2022, no specific allegation has been made so as to prima facie show that offence under Section 306 IPC has been committed. In support of his contentions, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case titled as "Gangula Mohan Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh", reported as (2010) 1 Supreme Court Cases 750 and also a judgment of a Co- ordinate Bench of this Court in "State of Punjab Vs. Kamaljit
1 of 2
Kaur alias Bholi and another", reported as 2008(2) RCR (Criminal) 562.
Notice of motion for 21.12.2022.
In the meantime, in the event of arrest, the petitioners are ordered to be released on interim bail subject to their furnishing personal bonds and surety to the satisfaction of Arresting / Investigating Officer. However, the petitioners shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall abide by the conditions as provided under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case.
05.12.2022 (VIKAS BAHL)
JUDGE"
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in
pursuance of the said order, the petitioner has joined the investigation.
Learned State counsel, on instructions from ASI Bhupinder, has
submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation and is not required for
further investigation.
Keeping in view the above said facts and circumstances
moreso, the facts which have been noticed in the order dated 05.12.2022,
and also the fact that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is not
required for further investigation, the present petition is allowed and the
interim order dated 05.12.2022 is made absolute.
Nothing stated above shall be construed as an expression of
opinion on the merits of the case and the trial would proceed independently
of the observations made in the present case which are only for the purpose
of adjudicating the present bail petition.
(VIKAS BAHL)
21.12.2022 JUDGE
ishwar
Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!