Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17232 P&H
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2022
CR-6034-2022
127 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CR-6034-2022
Date of Decision: December 19, 2022
Anoop Kumar ...Petitioner
Versus
Anil Kumar and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
Present:- Mr. Jagdish Manchanda and Mr. Nischal Chetanya Manchanda, Advocates for the petitioner.
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.(Oral)
This revision is directed against the impugned order dated
06.09.2022 passed by learned District Judge, Jalandhar, whereby appeal
has been dismissed under Order 9 Rule 2 CPC qua respondent Nos.5 and
7 for not filing of the publication charges as ordered earlier.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that
respondent Nos.5- Naresh Kumar was already proceeded ex parte before
the Trial Court as is evident from the Trial Court judgment. Similarly,
respondent No.7 Smt. Rita had been proceeded ex parte in the appeal
itself vide order dated 26.07.2016. Learned counsel has relied upon the
judgment of a Full Bench of this Court in case of "Mohan Masih vs Smt.
Bashiro and others", reported as 1988(2) PLR 138, as per which if a
respondent is ex parte before the Courts below, there is no need for
serving the said respondents again in the appeal.
Page no.1 out of 2 pages
1 of 2
CR-6034-2022
3. The abovesaid submissions contain merit. As respondent
Nos.5 and 7 are already ex parte, so the present revision is accepted. The
impugned order is set aside.
4. Revision stands disposed of.
December 19, 2022 (DEEPAK GUPTA)
sarita JUDGE
Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
Page no.2 out of 2 pages
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!