Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bittoo vs State Of Haryana
2022 Latest Caselaw 17193 P&H

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 17193 P&H
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2022

Punjab-Haryana High Court
Bittoo vs State Of Haryana on 19 December, 2022
SANDEEP
2022.12.17 20:37

CRM-M-41550-2022 -l-

243
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-41550-2022
Date of Decision:- 19.12.2022.
BITTOO ....Petitioner
Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent

CORAM:-HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE AMARJOT BHATTI

Present:- Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Deepshikha Chauhan, Asstt. AG, Haryana.

3 2 2s 2c 3i¢

AMARJOT BHATTI, J. (Oral)

The petitioner -- Bittoo has filed the instant petition under Section 439 CrP.C. for grant of regular bail in FIR No.22 dated 18.01.2022 under Sections 343, 366, 376 and 506 IPC and Section 376 (2) IPC as well as 67 and 67-A of IT Act registered at Women Police Station, Pehowa, District Kurukshetra.

The brief facts of the case are that the victim filed written complaint alleging that she was married to Jai Bhagwan on 08.02.2009 and out of this wedlock she was having two sons and a daughter. In February, 2020 she had gone to Sood Eye Hospital at Kaithal for her treatment. She was short of money and in this context she came in contact with Bittoo. They exchange their phone numbers as she had borrowed Rs.1500/- from him. The accused started calling her. She was called by

him on 2-3 occasions at Kaithal. He also came to her parental house at

| attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

SANDEEP 2022.12.17 20:37

Batheri, Tehsil, Pehowa and compelled to meet her on 15.12.2021. On 02.01.2022 she was threatened by him to accompanying him otherwise he would kill her children. He was compelling her to do wrongful act with him and he had also recorded the conversations and on that account he was threatening her. He maintained physical relations with her many times. On 03.01.2021 he took her signatures on some documents in the office of an Advocate. She was kept confined for two days and her mobile phone was also snatched. He recovered her mobile phone. Ultimately the matter was reported to the Police.

Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that all the allegations levelled against him are false. In-fact he along with the complainant were live-in relationship since July, 2021. A deed and an affidavit dated 04.01.2022 were also executed which are Annexure P-1 and P-2. He was arrested on 30.01.2022. The challan is also presented. The complainant is a married lady having three children. She has narrated a concocted version. He is ready to abide by the terms of bail order. It is prayed that his regular bail application may be allowed.

The bail application is opposed by learned counsel representing the State. In the written reply it is conferred that challan is already presented on 31.03.2022 and after the framing of charge two of the prosecution witnesses are already examined and the next date was fixed for 29.10.2022. It is argued that the allegations are serious and the petitioner is specifically named, therefore, he is not entitled to be released on bail.

I have gone through the record. It cannot be disputed that the complainant is a married lady having three children. The petitioner has

placed on record copy of a deed dated 04.01.2022 and affidavit of the same

| attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

date according to which they started living together. These documents are duly signed by both the parties. Challan in this case is already presented and the case is fixed for prosecution evidence. The petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2022. The conclusion of the trial may take some time. The petitioner cannot be kept behind the bars for indefinite time period. He is ready to abide by the terms of the bail order.

Therefore, without expressing my mind on the merits of the case, the regular bail application filed by the petitioner -- Bittoo is allowed. He is ordered to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Judge concerned.

The petition is disposed of.

19.12.2022 (AMARJOT BHATTI) snd JUDGE

Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No.

Whether reportable: Yes/No

SANDEEP

2022.12.17 20:37

| attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter