Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramashray Singh vs The State Of Bihar
2026 Latest Caselaw 156 Patna

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 156 Patna
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Patna High Court

Ramashray Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 22 January, 2026

Author: Purnendu Singh
Bench: Purnendu Singh
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.540 of 2026
     ======================================================
1.    Ramashray Singh S/o Late Sakaldeo Singh
2.   Krishna Nandan Singh, S/o Late Sakaldeo Singh
     Both resident of village- Goshrawan, P.S.- Giriyak, Disrtrict- Nalanda,
     Bihar, (803115).

                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                        Versus
1.   The State of Bihar
2.   The Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of
     Bihar, Patna.
3.   The Secretary, Department of Road Construction, Government of Bihar,
     Patna.
4.   The District Magistrate Nalanda, At Biharsharif, District- Nalanda.
5.   The Additional Collector, Land Reforms, Nalanda At Biharsharif, District-
     Nalanda.
6.   The Deputy Collector Incharge cum Secretary, Public Grievance Cell
     Nalanda at Biharsharif, District- Nalanda.
7.   The District Land Acquisition Officer, Nalanda At Biharsharif, District-
     Nalanda.
8.   The Circle Officer (C.O.), Giriyak, District- Nalanda.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Aaruni Singh, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Majid Mahbood Khan, Advocate
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
     ORAL JUDGMENT
      Date : 22-01-2026

                   Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

      petitioners and the land counsel for the State.

                  2. The petitioners in paragraph no. 1 of the present

      writ petition have sought inter alia following relief(s), which is

      reproduced hereinafter:-

                   "A. For issuance of an appropriate writ order or
                   direction commanding the respondents to pay the
 Patna High Court CWJC No.540 of 2026 dt.22-01-2026
                                           2/6




                       compensation amount to the petitioners at an
                       enhanced rate as per claim made in representation
                       date 06-06-2013, Petition dated 25-08-2014 as well
                       as 20-03-2015 for the land of the Petitioners which
                       has been acquired under emergent process while
                       Notification dated 06-12-2013 and Declaration
                       dated 09-12-2013 published in District Gazettes
                       bearing P.R. No. 104/2013-14 for constriction of
                       Pawapuri-Ghosrawan Road, situated in village
                       Ghosrawan, Thana No.-309, Anchal-Giriyak,
                       District-Nalanda.

                       B. For issuance of an appropriate writ order or
                       direction commanding the Respondents to dispose
                       of the Representation date 06-06-2013 as well as
                       20-03-2015

filed by the present Petitioners along with others before the District Land Acquisition Officer Patna, District- Patna with a prayer to pay the remaining compensation amount and also to enhance the rate of the land of the Petitioners.

C. For issuance of an appropriate writ order or direction commanding the Respondents either to pay the compensation amount at an enhanced rate as per claim made in Representation date 06-06- 2013. Petition dated 25-08-2014 as well as 20-03- 2015 to the Petitioners for the land of the Petitioners which has been acquired under emergent process or de-notify the said Notification by releasing the land of the Petitioners by handing over the possession over the land which has been acquired.

D. For issuance of an appropriate writ order or commanding the Respondents to make reference of the land Acquisition Case No. 10 of 2014-2015 to concern Land Acquisition Judge for re-evaluation of the land which initiated by the authorities on the Petition filed by the present Petitioners before the District Land Acquisition Officer District-Nalanda with a prayer to enhance the rate of the land of the Petitioners.

E. For any other relief of reliefs for which Patna High Court CWJC No.540 of 2026 dt.22-01-2026

Petitioners are entitled in the opinion of this Hon'ble High Court."

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioners submitted that the petitioners are raiyat and their

land was acquired for the purpose of construction of Pawapuri-

Ghosrawan Road.

4. The description of the land has been mentioned in

Paragraph No.4 of the writ petition.

5. Before acquisition of the land, the petitioners were

given opportunity to file their objection and the petitioners did

so by filing an objection as per the provisions of Bihar

Agriculture Land (Conversion for Non-Agriculture Purposes)

Act, 2010 (hereinafter to be referred as the 'Act, 2010') and the

petitioners were paid the required compensation.

6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioners informs that for similar relief(s), other family

members of the petitioners had approached this Court by filing

CWJC No.14048 of 2017 (Kanti Devi & Anr. Vs. The State of

Bihar & Ors.) for making payment of required compensation on

the basis of MVR in respect of the commercial land.

7. Learned counsel further informs that the petitioners

had received compensation, as per the award, in the year, 2015

under protest and now the petitioners by filing the present writ Patna High Court CWJC No.540 of 2026 dt.22-01-2026

petition seeks difference amount of compensation after

declaring their land to be 'commercial land'.

8. Per contra, Mr. Majid Mahboob Khan, learned

counsel appearing on behalf of the State is opposing the reliefs,

as prayed for in the present writ petition, on the ground that the

land falling in the vicinity of the petitioners to be commercial

land, as per the report of the Sub Registrar of the district

prepared on the basis of Market Value Register (MVR)

determined by the State Government for commercial land, as

such, the petitioners are not entitled for any reliefs as prayed for

in the present writ petition, as till date, the land of the petitioners

is recorded as agricultural land and not non-agricultural land.

9. Heard the parties.

10. Having considered the rival submissions made on

behalf of the parties, I find that it is admitted that the petitioners

have been paid compensation in the year, 2015, under protest,

which had been fixed for agriculture land and thereafter, the

petitioners filed a representation before the District Land

Acquisition Officer, Nalanda on 06.06.2013 and also before the

District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Nalanda on 25.08.2014 to

make payment of the compensation for commercial land as

fixed in MVR but they have not heed to the said request made Patna High Court CWJC No.540 of 2026 dt.22-01-2026

by the petitioners.

11. This Court finds that recently the State

Government has come out with Bihar Agriculture Land

(Conversion for Non-Agricultural Purposes) Act, 2010 for

conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural purpose after

making payment of required conversion fee at the rate of current

market value.

12. After coming into force of Act, 2010, the land of

the petitioners was acquired on 06.12.2013, as such, the

petitioners are themselves responsible for not getting their land

converted into non-agriculture land, which was being used for

commercial purpose and the rent was also being paid on the

basis of revenue fixed for commercial land and it has been

supported by the report of the Circle Officer, Giriyak as

contained in Letter No.992 dated 28.09.2013 and the Sub

Registrar, Rajgir, as contained in Letter No.93 dated 02.03.2015.

13. In view of the admitted position, as well as, the

provision of Act, 2010, report of the Circle Officer, Nalanda,

report of the Sub Registrar and the MVR fixed for the land in

the vicinity where the land of the petitioners is located, I find

that the petitioners may approach the Competent Authority, who

is the Sub-divisional Officer, as per the provision of Section 5 of Patna High Court CWJC No.540 of 2026 dt.22-01-2026

Act, 2010, however, this will not come in the way of the District

Land Acquisition Officer concerned for making payment of the

required compensation at the rate of commercial value of the

land, which was prevalent in the year, 2015 when the petitioners

had admittedly accepted the amount of compensation calculated

on the basis of MVR relating to the agriculture land though

under protest.

14. The above exercise is required to be completed

well within a period of three months from the date of passing of

this order.

15. With the above observation/direction, the present

writ petition stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) chn/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          22.01.2026
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter