Wednesday, 20, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vijay Bharti vs The State Of Bihar Through The Chief ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 4012 Patna

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4012 Patna
Judgement Date : 26 September, 2025

Patna High Court

Vijay Bharti vs The State Of Bihar Through The Chief ... on 26 September, 2025

Author: Arun Kumar Jha
Bench: Arun Kumar Jha
         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                  Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2086 of 2025
     ======================================================
     Vijay Bharti Son of Late Deonath Bharti @ Late Devnath Bharti Resident of
     Village - Akhtiyarpur, P.S.- Garkha, District - Saran at Chapra.

                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
     Bihar
2.   The State Sentence Remission Board through its Chairman, Government of
     Bihar, Patna. Bihar
3.   The Principal Secretary Ministry of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna.
     Bihar
4.   The Secretary-cum-Legal Remembrancer, Department of Law, Government
     of Bihar. Bihar
5.   The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna. Bihar
6.   The Director Probation Services, Government of Bihar, Patna. Bihar
7.   The Inspector General (Prison) and Jail Reforms, Government of Bihar,
     Patna. Bihar
8.   The Jail Superintendent, Central Jail, Motihari. Bihar

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Suneil Kumar Thakur, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. AC to SC-8
     ======================================================
        CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                         ORAL JUDGMENT
      Date : 26-09-2025

                Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

      learned counsel for the State-respondents.

                02. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition

      seeking direction to the respondent authorities to place the case

      of the petitioner for his premature release before the State

      Sentence Remission Board (hereinafter referred to as 'the

      Board') by extending the benefit of remission on the ground that
 Patna High Court CR. WJC No.2086 of 2025 dt.26-09-2025
                                            2/3




         he has already completed the qualifying period of

         incarceration entitling him of such benefit.

                    03. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits

         that the petitioner has been convicted for the offence under

         Sections 302/149 and 447 of the Indian Penal Code after

         facing trial, vide Sessions Trial No. 110 of 1997, arising out of

         Garkha P.S. Case No. 146 of 1995, by the learned 4 th Additional

         Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra vide judgment of conviction

         dated 23.06.2012 and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous

         imprisonment for life with fine vide order of sentence dated

         25.06.2012

. Being aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and

order, the petitioner filed Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 658 of 2012

before this Court, which upheld and confirmed the judgment

and order of the learned trial court vide judgment dated

26.09.2018. The learned counsel further submits that now the

petitioner has completed for more than 14 years of his actual

incarceration and more than 20 years with remission. The

learned counsel further submits that the petitioner moved a

petition, after completion of his actual incarceration of 14 years,

before the Board through the Jail Superintendent, Motihari

making a prayer for his premature release, but till date no action

has been taken on the said petition of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.2086 of 2025 dt.26-09-2025

04. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State-

respondents submits that if any such petition has been preferred

by the petitioner, the respondent authorities will look into it and

place the matter before the Board for its consideration at the

earliest.

05. Having regard to the submission made on behalf of

the parties, the concerned respondent authorities are directed to

place the petition of the petitioner seeking premature release

before the Board within a month from today. Thereafter, the

Board is directed to obtain required reports from the statutory

authorities within a period of one month. Thereafter, appropriate

decision on the petition of the petitioner be taken by the Board

in accordance with law within a period of one month.

06. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) V.K.Pandey/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          26.09.2025
Transmission Date       NA
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter